Richard Wilson, Pro Se                                        Reserved for Supreme Court of Kansas Filing Stamp.

2111 East Santa Fe #274, Olathe Kansas 66062.  

Cell: 913 302 8693       wilsonbrandx@yahoo.com

Fax: 913-795-2710

Palaschak: 888 476 8954 Lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com

 

This document is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8965.pdf

 http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8965.html and http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8965.wpd

The Application is at http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8903.pdf

 

In the Supreme Court of Kansas

Clerk of the Appellate Courts, Kansas Judicial Center

301 S.W. 10th Avenue, Room 374, Topeka, Kansas 66612-1507

785-296-3229, Fax:785-296-1028, Email: appellateclerk@kscourts.org http://www.kscourts.org/

 

Richard Wilson,

                         Petitioner

v

Judge Richard Smith of the Court of the 6th Judicial District Court of Kansas

Smith, 318 Chestnut, Mound City, Kansas 66056. 913-795-2660 Fax: 913-795-2004. http://www.kscourts.org/dstcts/6dstct.htm

Respondent

 


Lower Court Case Number 06 TR 947

Supreme Court #07-99586

Document #8965 Version 1.000

Withdrawal of Application for Writ of Mandate Compelling Judge Smith to Order the Production of an E-transcript and Quash this traffic ticket case until a duly authorized prosecutor files a written complaint.

Proof of Service upon the office of Respondent Judge Smith.

Previous Proposed Hearing/ Briefing Schedule:

Petitioner’s Brief Due by Tuesday 22 Jan 2008

Respondent’s Brief Due by Monday 25 Feb 2008



Withdrawal of Application for Writ.

            I hereby withdraw my application submitted around November 19, 2007. I will attempt to resolve this issue at the trial court. At the trial court Judge Smith vacated the premature trial date thereby eliminating the crisis that triggered my original Application. There are 4 issues. I hope to resolve and clarify some of them at the trial court. I hope to separate the issues. Here are those issues:

1.         The judge was biased. He researched and argued the case for the prosecution; the prosecutor did not participate. The judge usurped the role of prosecutor.

2.         The judge did not submit his brief /argument to me in advance. He denied me the opportunity to rebut. He announced his brief/ precedent argument and his decision/ order simultaneously.

3.         The judge supplied no e-copy of his main precedent. He supplied no paper copy. He supplied no hyperlink to the case.

4.         The court reporter refused to provide e-transcripts. I will seek a local writ in that regard.

Signed _____________________ Richard Wilson. December 24, 2007.

Proof of Service

            I, __________________, served this document upon the office of Judge Smith by mail. I served the Supreme Court by mail. Signed ______________________ Monday, December 24, 2007