November 16, 2007:      Paid off Lynnwood ticket. It was in collections., total $263.00. Ordered audio CDs of October 22 Monroe hearing and of January 2 Lynnwood hearing. Got Lynwood police report. Cop perjured himself.

November 26, 2007:      Monday 1:30PM Monroe arraignment hearing Courtroom 2 

List of Players:

206 235 6588 forrest Bishop

Man and wife in other car on I-5.

Un-witness WSP (Washington State Patrol) Cop #573.

Neo-Medieval Snohomish City Cop, Officer GACK, #1733.

Lynnwood Court Snohomish Couty District Court, South Division 20520 68TH Ave. W Lynnwood, WA 98036-7406 425-774-8803 (phone) 425-744-6820 (fax)

Monroe Court (Case#C34695S) Snohomish Couty District Court, Evergreen Division 14414 179th Ave. SE Monroe, WA 98272 360-805-6776 360-805-6755 (fax) Judge Patricia Lynne Lyon (Monroe case assigned to, issued arrest warrant)

Neo-Medieval Snohomish County Sheriff “Living the Dream”.

Judge Patricia Lynne Lyon (Monroe case assigned to)

Snohomish Jail, Everett Snohomish County Corrections 3025 Oakes Ave. Everett, WA, 98201Phone: 425-388-3395

Neo-Medieval Torturers: jailer STANDISH, intake jailer “Laughing Boy”, Supervisor “Short Eyebrows”, jailer “Lyndie Englund”, etc.

Proposed Motion to Vacate Void Judgment - There is a better one from Forrest email.

  The judgment entered on January 2, 2007 in Case #WSP I05051136 by the [Lynnwood Court] is null and void for the following reasons, inter alia. Each count stands as evidence of void judgment, jointly and severably.

1) Perjury. WSP Officer #753 was not present at the time of the auto accident. He arrived much later. He has sworn that Bishop's ""was speeding too fast for conditions" This constitutes perjury, somewhat similar to USSC Kalina v..Fletcher (1997).

2) Speculation. WSP Officer #753 was not present at the time of the auto accident. He arrived much later. He wrote out a "ticket" for SPEED TOO FAST", RCW 46.61.400. There was no way for him to know what occurred in the past, this was pure speculation.

3) No Hearing. Alleged defendant Bishop appeared by mail. The DEMAND TO QUASH FRIVIOULS LAWSUIT, sent Dec 28th, 2006, was ignored. Summary judgment was entered, thereby denying Bishop access to the court.

X ) No Verified Complaint. Lawyerdude argument

X) Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies. The prosecution of traffic violations is an administrative complaint subject to the Administrative Procedure Act. The State has failed to present to this court the agency's final decision from which the prosecution- if there was any- would have sought judicial review. The prosecution has failed to exhaust any and all of its administrative remedies. The defendant has been denied administrative due process and hearing. There was no finding of facts and law nor was a decision or order issued by the agency involved.

X) Withholding Evidence. Bishop has been denied administrative due process and hearing. There was no finding of facts and law nor was a decision or order issued by the agency involved. The State has therefore withheld exculpatory evidence (final decision or order).

X) Failure to State a Claim Upon Which Relief may be Granted. Because the State failed to exhaust all of its administrative remedies it was unable to produce evidence of an agency final decision for this court to judicially review. The State has failed to state a claim upon which this court may grant relief.

X) Lack of Jurisdiction. The court has jurisdiction to judicially review an agency final decision or order but, without such evidence, lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Additional violations of Due Process not cited herein further vitiate the claim to subject matter jurisdiction.

X) et cetera

WHEREFORE, Forrest Bishop requests that the judgment be vacated for any or for all of the reasons stated herein.. Further, in as much as Forrest Bishop's rights have already been derogated, it is requested that this vacation be made WITH PREJUDICE.