8843 version 1.01 Lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com 888 476 8954
P NJ 101: Definition and Glossary of the Patriot Nut Job movement.
This subdocument is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8843.html
The PNJ (Patriot Nut Job) movement is a part of the anti-government movement that began with the Boston Tea Party. Their heart is in the right place but the PNJ movement is largely uneducated dumbasses who fall prey to other uneducated predatory manipulative dumbasses like Leroy Schweitzer from “Justus” township in Montana. Wikipedia explains it.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montana_Freemen
The Montana Freemen were a Christian Patriot group based in Montana, United States, near the town of Jordan. The Montana Freemen believed in the doctrine of individual sovereignty as expounded by the Sovereign Citizen Movement, and rejected the authority of the U.S. Federal Government. As a result of these beliefs, they attempted to set up their own parallel systems of government ("Justus Township"), common-law court, banking, and credit. They became publicly known during their 81-day-long standoff with U.S. Federal Marshals from March 25 through June 13, 1996.
Leroy Schweitzer and the Freemen used Anderson on the Uniform Commercial Code, a Bankers Handbook and various other materials related to the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) to file notices of liens against public officials. The purported liens were then allegedly sold to generate equity to fund efforts of the Freeman to make a "firm offer to pay off the national debt". The Freemen believed that the liens conformed to the UCC, and that their "Justus Township" court had an interest in a tort claim for damages, or for damages incurred by the named public officials for violations of their oaths of office. The Freeman viewed the public officials's support and support of the credit system as a non-constitutional act that was "...depriving the people of their property until our posterity wakes up homeless...".
Their efforts, from the Freeman perspective, raised the awareness of what the Freemen viewed as the never ending perpetual national debt fiat credit system, and of the relationship of that system to inflation and price manipulations that the Freemen believed were financially undermining and bankrupting the private individual class of farmers and ranchers. Laws were subsequently changed in Montana,[citation needed] and eventually elsewhere,[citation needed] to require that any liens filed had to have a current county judge or clerk signature to be held valid as "commercial paper" which can be sold or traded.
Freemen contended in various shortwave and talk radio interviews that several of the liens were sold into the offshore banking market. Some Freemen or members of their families claimed that pressure tactics were used to induce Schweitzer and others to release the liens on public officials.
See also
* micronation http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micronation
* Branch Davidians (1993)
* Ruby Ridge (1992)
* Government debt (national debt)
* Government financial reports
Sovereign Citizen Movement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Citizen_Movement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Sovereign Citizen Movement is a political movement in the United States which grew out of claims concerning government abuses of citizens' rights. Other names for "sovereign citizens" include "freemen" (see Montana Freemen) and "common law citizens".
This movement is based on theories that U.S. citizens are either "Fourteenth Amendment citizens" (who are subject to the federal and state laws and taxes) or "sovereign citizens", who are subject only to common law or "constitutional law" (or both), not to statutory law. Under these theories, sovereign citizens are exempt from any laws with which they do not agree. No court has ever upheld these arguments[1] (see Tax protester arguments). The Uniform Commercial Code plays an important part in these legal theories.
"Sovereign citizens" often avoid using zip codes, and refuse to hold social security cards or driver's licenses.
Some African-American groups have adopted Sovereign Citizen beliefs,[2] which sometimes include a distinction between the Corporation and the Government, which (under these theories) no longer operates in the traditional sense.
Contents
* 1 Commercial Redemption - Beneficiaries in Common
* 2 Critique
* 3 References
* 4 See also
[edit] Commercial Redemption - Beneficiaries in Common
In turn, the Sovereign Citizen movement gave rise to the "Redemption Movement".[citation needed] The Redemption Movement is being brought together under a new banner called Beneficiaries in Common.[citation needed]
The main premise is that the United States is a "Trust". The Congressman and Senators Trustees, and the common people are the beneficiaries of that Trust. Under this theory, the United States went bankrupt in 1933 and provided a remedy under something called "Limited Liability" in the form of Social Security Insurance.
Under this theory, when the United States, any of its political subdivisions, or any entity in the United States makes a claim, that claim can be "accepted for value", giving a banker's acceptance in full satisfaction of the obligation under bankruptcy. Once this "acceptance" has been given and valuable consideration has been given, something called "contract in fact" exists under this theory. A living man's signature gives "value" to the instrument, turning it from a "soft" offer to a "firm" offer. Taking a bill and "accepting it for value" turns the bill from "soft currency" into "hard currency".
Another theory is that the United States created a vessel for the beneficiaries to business on the high seas of commerce, and that this vessel is called the Strawman -- documented on the Birth Certificate, which "berthed" the vessel in the port of the United States. Under the theory, this Strawman does business in the "public", on behalf of the beneficiary, and is the "surety" for all debts created in his name.
The idea circulating within the redemption movement is that by taking control of the Strawman with a "Perfected Lien" or a "Bond", that the Strawman now becomes reunited with its rightful owner, and now one has a vehicle in which to do business and accept all claims, and those claims can be taken to the United States Treasury for liquidation.
Another theory of the movement is that when a business makes an offer and does provide the remedy or check along with it, the business is making a false claim. Under this theory, if remedy is not provided by the offering Party, then remedy can be provided by the accepting party. In other words, if the state is making a claim by producing criminal charges, and those charges are not bonded properly, and there is no check provided for remedy, then the charges can be accepted for value, signed by the real living flesh and blood person, given real value, then sent back for adjustment of the debt. Under this theory, if the debt is not adjusted, the dishonor from that can then be accepted and liquidation through the Treasury can be done next.
Redemptionists take their Certified Copy of their Birth Certificate and deposit it with the Treasury Accepted for Value, with a copy of their bond with their Strawman agreeing to be their debtor. Then this become part of the account authorizing the Treasury to pass through the individual Tax Exemption or Prepaid Account, to access the funds for remedy to be provided.
Public officials that make offers and do not provide remedy may have their bonds attached, and notice of their attached bonds sent by Notary to Risk Management, notifying Risk Management that a lien is in place against the bond of the official. Under the theory, this causes the public official to be unemployable when Risk Management attaches their bond.
Adherents of the Redemption movement claim that it is about living in equity, in commerce, in peaceful co-existence with the United States government. Some movement members believe that bankers are keeping people from learning about what some movement members believe is the power of one's own signature and the money allegedly created by that power, and that bankers are actively pursuing people who use these strategies, locking up movement members in order to make it appear that those who support the movement are doing things incorrectly and illegally.[citation needed]
Roger Elvick is a founder of the movement.[3] Elvick was sentenced to 4 years jail in April 2005 after pleading guilty to one count each of forgery, extortion and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity.[4]
[edit] Critique
The Anti-Defamation League, on its website, contends:
The "sovereign citizen" movement is a loosely organized collection of groups and individuals who have adopted a right-wing anarchist ideology originating in the theories of a group called the Posse Comitatus in the 1970s. Its adherents believe that virtually all existing government in the United States is illegitimate and they seek to "restore" an idealized, minimalist government that never actually existed. To this end, sovereign citizens wage war against the government and other forms of authority using "paper terrorism" harassment and intimidation tactics, and occasionally resorting to violence.[1]
[edit] References
1. ^ In the context of U.S. Federal income taxation, see Lovell v. United States, 755 F.2d 517, 85-1 U.S. Tax Cases. (CCH) paragraph. 9208 (7th Cir. 1984); and United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 91-2 U.S. Tax Cases. (Commerce Clearing House) paragraph. 50,388 (7th Cir. 1991), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 1060, 112 S. Ct. 940 (1992).
2. ^ Are sovereign citizens racist?, Message to Students, Militia Watchdog archives, Anti-Defamation League website
3. ^ http://www.freedomdomain.com/redemption1.html
4. ^ Patriots for Profit, Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Report, Summer 2005
[edit] See also
* Conspiracy theory
The PNJ (Patriot Nut Job) movement began with high school dropouts selling white rings binders and conducting expensive seminars. Today that forum continues. The invention of the internet fanned the flames of the PNJ movement. Now they sell on the internet. It is ignorant white trash exploiting other ignorant white trash. There are geographical hotbeds of PNJ. Merlin, Oregon is a such hotbed. To their credit, the PNJ are simply seeking freedom from our oppressive government. However, they were doing stupid stuff while some of us where obtaining an education.
I began investigating the PNJ movement when I worked for a Mormon PNJ client in the year 2000. Mormons are much like the PNJ in that they live in isolation where they can practice their stupid ways - such as wearing Mormon underwear and giving all the women to the rich guy.
The PNJ and all cults and corrupt organizations (such as the military) use their own jargon. Here is the PNJ jargon in this glossary. If I find a glossary on Wikipedia I will use that but I have not found one so far.
Glossary
accepted for value
All Caps (all capital letters) is the way that PNJ’s emphasize what they write:
.
American’s Bulletin, The: A PNJ newspaper published in Jackson County, near Medford, Oregon by an uneducated dumbass named Robert Kelly. This newspaper is plum full of bullshit PNJ theory.
bankers acceptance
bill of exchange
commercial liens
Commercial Redemption
financing statement
LEO Law Enforcement Officer. Lawyerdude uses the less pretentious, simpler term: cop.
preferred stock
private side
redemption
Roger Elvick: (Lawyerdude paraphrased this from a website http://www.freedomdomain.com/redemption1.html supposedly written (2-2-01) and still up on the net:) Roger Elvick is falsely credited with inventing “Commercial Redemption". Roger merely regurgitated it in gibberish that he wrote from prison. I read Elvick’s writings from prison. I interviewed him by telephone twice while he was out of prison. He mixes Christianity with banking. It is pathetically stupid. Commercial Redemption is a bogus process and philosophy developed by _________
People who use this process end up in prison. Roger Elvick is an uneducated loudmouth who pissed away the farm that his dad left him. Roger received the farm free and clear. Roger pissed it away. Roger stole a 1953 John Deere 70 tractor from his neighbor by passing a bad check. After a year the neighbor repossessed his stolen tractor.
Elvick’s video is on the internet. It shows what an idiot he is. He makes it up as he goes along.
Roger does not know the meaning of words. Like many dumbasses in jail, he has his own definitions - and they are wrong.
“Negotiable instrument” is a term that Roger does not understand. He says that a check drawn on a closed account is a negotiable instrument. The rest of the world says that it is a forgery and a proof that the writer has committed a crime.
Roger and his followers including the Getzchmans of Iowa claim to have privy to the inner workings of the federal reserve. The young Getzschman told me that he has a friend at the window at the federal reserve, a friend who will cash his sight drafts. He is a liar.
Elvick has a cult following among the PNJ. Roger, himself, says that he does not teach this process to anyone directly. That is because of the terms of his parole - which he violates. Several cult followers have conversations with him on the phone in prison. Then they write the gibberish from these conversations.
http://www.splcenter.org/intel/intelreport/article.jsp?aid=544
Roger Elvick
As the creator of the "Redemption movement," a bizarre fusion of conspiracy theories and financial chicanery, Roger Elvick claims he has liberated his "straw man," a secret doppelganger created by the U.S. government to capture the economic value of U.S. citizens who, according to the Redemption doctrine, have unknowingly been sold into slavery to a Jewish-run international banking cabal.
But while Elvick's straw man is free—at least in his own mind—the rest of him is back in prison.
In April, Elvick pleaded guilty to one count each of forgery, extortion and engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity, and was sentenced to four years in an Ohio state penitentiary. The 68-year-old far-right extremist and former Aryan Nations associate was charged for aiding and abetting a ring of Redemption scammers based in Akron, Ohio, home to Right Way Law, a clearinghouse for the Redemption movement's pseudo-legal shenanigans.
The Redemption movement is founded upon Elvick's outer-limits postulation that for every birth certificate issued in the U.S. since the 1936 Social Security Act, the federal government deposits $630,000 in a hidden bank account linked to the newborn American. Redemptionists claim that by executing a series of arcane legal maneuvers, a person may entitle themselves to the $630,000 held in the name of the phantom entity created at their birth, and may then access these funds with "sight drafts" — better known to business owners and prosecutors as "bogus checks." Elvick also encourages Redemption enthusiasts to harass enemies with phony property liens and IRS reports designed to provoke audits.
Elvick first started spreading his crackpot vision in the 1980s, when he was the national spokesperson for Committee of the States, a white supremacist group Elvick started with William Potter Gale, who had previously founded the Posse Comitatus, a violent anti-Semitic organization.
By 1990, Redemption groups advised by Elvick were active in 30 states and several provinces of Canada, and had tried to pass more than $15 million in bad checks. Elvick was eventually convicted of personally passing more than $1 million in sight drafts, and, in a separate case, of filing fraudulent IRS forms. He spent most of the 1990s in federal prison.
But while he was incarcerated, the Redemption movement lured ever-growing legions of antigovernment extremists with the combined promise of free money and the chance to attack the federal government with paperwork instead of guns.
After Elvick was released, he started holding expensive seminars where he instructed Redemption acolytes. It wasn't long before he was back in big trouble. Elvick was indicted on multiple felony counts in Ohio in August 2003.
During preliminary hearings, Elvick frustrated court officials by denying his identity, claiming the court had no jurisdiction over him or his straw man, and constantly interrupting with unfathomable questions about procedure. A judge ruled Elvick mentally unfit to stand trial and committed him to a correctional psychiatric facility, where he was diagnosed with an "unclassified mental disorder" and underwent nine months of treatment before facing trial. Elvick then surprised prosecutors by changing his plea to guilty.
When asked if he wished to address the court at his sentencing, the usually vociferous Elvick replied simply, "I have nothing to say."
sam Davis
secured party
sight drafts
strawman
strawman redemption
Sui Juris means “free white and 21" It is also the name of a website www.suijuris.net which kicked Lawyerdude from its group although Lawyerdude writings are still there. Sui Juris site is at the opposite end of the spectrum from Quatloos, a site run by IRS sycophant.
Tacit Procurance. The PNJ tactic of attaching a offer as a rider on a document or act that is required to be done. It proves that the PNJ guy has no knowledge of contract law. Observe that the governments at all levels do the same thing by attaching conditions/ strings on any rights that they administer. Example: The government is obligated to provide proof that you passed your driver test. Knowing that they are the sole source for this proof, they require you to buy car insurance. Even though there are two issues here, the government eliminates your chance to litigate the latter by tying it to the former. Illegal tying/ pricing arrangements violate federal laws administered by the Federal trade commission, but so do the various state bar acts and a multitude of other state laws.
--------------------
tac·it 1. Not spoken: indicated tacit approval by smiling and winking.
2.
1. Implied by or inferred from actions or statements:
Management has given its tacit approval to the plan.
2. Law Arising by operation of the law rather than through
direct expression.
---------------------
www.dictionary.com says that the American Heritage Dictionary says:
pro·cure
v. pro·cured, pro·cur·ing, pro·cures
v. tr.
1. To get by special effort; obtain or acquire: managed to procure
a pass.
2. To bring about; effect: procure a solution to a knotty problem.
3. To obtain (a sexual partner) for another.
-------------------------
Example from post #14983 at my Yahoo group:
-- In The_Lawyerdude@yahoogroups.com, "Shaky" <akashaky@... wrote:
Would the following text posted on a vehicle stand up in court if and when a tow operator steals a vehicle at request of a LEO? Especially if it is proven that the LEO had no authority to make the request. I am not licensed nor is the van registered. I now live in Tennessee and I do not wish to trade the Right to Travel for the "privilege to drive".
NOTICE TO ALL TOW OPERATORS; THIS VAN IS PRIVATE PROPERTY.
IF THIS VAN IS NOT ENDANGERING ANYONE, THEN WITHOUT A COURT ORDER, OR
WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE LAWFUL OWNER/TENANT OF THIS VAN, YOU MAY
NOT MOVE IT. IF YOU DO, YOU AGREE FOR YOURSELF AND YOUR COMPANY
(NOTICE TO YOU IS NOTICE TO YOUR COMPANY) TO PAY THE OWNER/TENANT OF
THIS VAN $20,000. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS CONTACT THE OWNER/TENANT
OF THIS VAN. YOU NOW UNDERSTAND THAT IF YOU TOW WITHOUT WRITTEN
PERMISSION FROM OWNER/TENANT OF THIS VAN YOU ARE STEALING AND AGREE TO
PAY OWNER/TENANT $20,000 FOR THIS THEFT WITHOUT QUESTION. YOU TOW, YOU
STEAL; YOU AGREE TO PAY $20,000.
Lawyerdude says to Shaky:
No, Shakey, your ALL CAPS sign is an attempted tacit procurance. The theory of tacit procurance is the stock in trade of the PNJ movement. (Patriot Nut Job movement) Every lawyer has passedContracts 101. He knows that a contract requires knowing acceptance.
The tow truck driver simply says this following: "Hey dumbass, I reject your offer written on the side of your truck and I am still taking your truck, so fuck you"
-----
Your answer should be:
"Oh yeah? Well you do so at your own peril there, Mr. defendant in federal court! I already have the complaint written. Here is your summons. See you in court. Oh, and I already have a lawyer. He wrote this. It is established law that you can't take my car without a hearing. I don't need no stinking contract. I have a constitutional right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. You are trampling on my rights. Where will this cop be when you are standing before a judge in federal court? This cop already has lawyers paid for by the government. You don't. If you unhook my car right now I will sue only the cop and leave you out of it."
treasury direct
ucc-1 financing statement