Richard Wilson Reserved for Clerk’s Filing Stamp.
2111 East Santa Fe #274, Olathe Kansas 66062.
913 302 8693
This document is http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8618.pdf http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8619.html , http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8618.doc and http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8618.wpd
Related documents:
Motion to Quash: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8332.pdf
Perjurious Complaint: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8535.pdf
Transcript of Previous court session. March 5: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8489.html
Transcript of February 5 court session: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8372.html
Court of the 6th Judicial District Court of Kansas
Court of Judge Richard Smith
318 Chestnut, Mound City, Kansas 66056
913-795-2660 Fax: 913-795-2004
Ann Ware, Clerk; Lori Simmons, Deputy Clerk; Christina Chapman, Perjurious Notary Public.
http://www.kscourts.org/dstcts/6dstct.htm
Clerks Ann Ware and Lori Simmons, having unlawfully usurped the prosecutorial function that is solely the province of the elected prosecutor, dba under false color of law and corrupt legal fiction as “The People of Kansas”
Plaintiffs
v
Richard Wilson, one of the actual People of Kansas.
Defendant
Case Number 06jTR 947
1nd Substantive Motion for Defendant.
Document #8618 Version 1.002
Demand to Strike Perjurious Complaint.
Demand to Dismiss.
Motion for imprisonment for 1 hour for Contempt of Court against Prosecutor ____ with illegible name and Notary Public Christina Chapman .
Demand for $500 from prosecutor for causing me the expense of challenging his defective complaints.
Demand for recordation by a stenographic court reporter.
Demand for prompt e-transcript of every hearing by email to my address shown above.
Date: Tuesday 19 June, 2007
Time: 9 a.m.
Place: 318 Chestnut, Mound City, Kansas
Demand to Strike Perjurious Complaint.
At the venue designated in the caption or at such other venue as the court shall designate, I will demand the relief set forth in the caption and in more detail below. The prosecution has filed a perjured document. I demand immediate dismissal with prejudice. I demand a fine leveled against the prosecutor and Christina Chapman.
Signed _________________ Richard Wilson. Monday, June 18, 2007.
Contents of this Demand to Quash/ Dismiss:
Notice of Concurrent and Upcoming Motions and Demands
Clerk has unconstitutionally usurped function of prosecutor; Dismissal is my remedy.
Table of Authorities and Fountains of Liberty cited herein:
U.S. Constitutional Clauses Cited herein:
The Kansas Constitution. Clauses cited herein:
Table of Statutes cited herein:
Notice of Concurrent and Upcoming Motions and Demands
1. I will be filing a motion to suppress all evidence in this case.
2. Regarding the Pretextual Stop using the instrument of a vague and overbroad statute, I will be challenging the statute should that issue arise. All traffic laws are merely recommendatory. Otherwise the statutes would be oppressive. I will be moving in that regard.
I was attending a meeting pertaining to the recall of my candidate on the county board. Without probable cause Officer Paul Filla signaled me to stop. Filla intended to intimidate me for my having attended the political meeting. Filla gave me a ticket for driving without a license.
On March 5 Judge gave the prosecution 21 days to properly file an actual complaint and serve it on me. On 26 March the clerk filed the blatantly patently perjurious complaint depicted at the following hyperlink: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8535.pdf
Clerk has unconstitutionally usurped function of prosecutor; Dismissal is my remedy.
There was no legal basis for this traffic stop/ ticket. Even if there had been a basis for the stop, a prosecutor would be required to make the decision to prosecute - not this clerk. I filed a motion #8332 to Quash on 5 Feb 2007. You can see this motion at http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8332.pdf The court ruled in my favor on 5 March 2007. That transcript of that March 5 court session can be seen at: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8372.html
I have not yet been arraigned. Reason: The prosecutor has not yet filed a valid complaint. The most recent complaint does not bear the legible name of any prosecutor. This most recent complaint merely proves up perjury on the part of the notary public.
Table of Authorities and Fountains of Liberty cited herein:
U.S. Constitutional Clauses Cited herein:
The Kansas Constitution. Clauses cited herein:
Table of Statutes cited herein:
I will not repeat my previous elaborate motion. I hereby incorporate it by reference. That previous motion is depicted at the following hyperlink: http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8332.pdf
The sole issue today is this: Will the court permit the prosecution yet another chance to file a valid complaint. The prosecution has filed a defective, perjured complaint. A penalty/ fine is appropriate.
Signed _________________Richard Wilson. Monday, June 18, 2007
I, Richard Wilson, served this document upon the prosecutor in open court this day.
I served the clerk at the filing window by personal hand delivery on this day.
Signed ______________________ Tuesday 19 June 2007
province of the elected prosecutor