WPCy C^nʪ3 l6ل6YZN{cZ}%{X\s:Eȿ0\6Ji,rg_^O)/bIpynxj6qfD)JvZ-N@aÆpz5; Y@0JaaC~~cXA%^篧daնnIuð %*?[] x~%a֢H;LYXiȹ>RWAZl< .@J@]r$[CULb q@LU}%%DP4{pLNLEPZ}.D6 x/8~.ķᠾ?SZ/$[\#FUN %] 0%cU,IDu^ w4 m D5 0YN: N*,`@@`2@|r4 0E = 0wC 0 @ 0)T 0hN! 0|! 2"LF";" :#XK# C# 0`)#b$)$ 0% -&3& : 'XF' 1u' 72(ZE(( 01cc,N,,d,N,-z-z-z-z-XX1Z11L 2 2XV2L222Z3ZV4Z4Z 5Zd5Z5N6Nf6f6f6 6`Z7b78 :bU;U;U;U; D5; B;; D5 < < < < < < <`><>< B*< B< B< D5= B7= D5T= B= D1= D5= D5 > B*A> D5k> B*> D5> B*> D5)? B7^? B7?? A`SBSBSB,B DDD`EmEE RH`HHHHH`\I!I`J=K PM MM`NN;N 7P7PZP7R SSS T2U OV VVVVVVVVVLWWW XXkY'iZ [[[[[[[ \\\\\ h\] "^ h^J0_ z`  a ,bb cNJdd PgNgDh 6ii jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj[k Xno oMgp qTr Xss uu vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvVw PxPxPxx Ryyyyyyy yhp LaserJet 10120(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(Y$XrXXX&Vm%XXr80XXdXXd8e  9,iAZArial http://www.michiganprosecutor.orgpj5 i5:i+003|xUffff)!dxdx(O$E. International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U.u.s. supreme court cases 889  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.44Q O  5  %&Rhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html6O  7 5Ԁ#&R%?#http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/faretta.htmlmailto:lawyerdude1989@yahoo.comhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html fySNNewcombehttp://www.co.bay.mi.us/bay/home.nsf/Public/Circuit_Court.htm   ,XrXXX&Vm%XXr d   d ((#(#(  Ae)1dE'01AAZ)1qdE#1AKe1 K 2 ( 3 ; 4   5  + 6    7    8   9 p  10   11 ` 12 s 13 P 14 c 15 @ 16 S 17 0  18 C" 19  $ 20  3& 21 "( 22 ##* 23 % , 24 x&". 25 '#0 26 h)%2 27 *{&4 28(3$ Y!XrXXX&Vm%XXr80XXdXXd8e  9   d  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _257.602aFleeingand_Eluding._http://www.paamtrafficsafety.com/hot_topics/fleeing_and_eluding.htmH(O;$0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#(H$0   (,!$0  0` (#(#  (@$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# ` (T$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (#0 (# (#  !http://www.injusticeline.com/Czu.htmlpage page chapter volume footnote endnote 257.602aMichigan statuteshttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.pdf(u.s. supreme court cases 889( $Page of & +)XrXXX&Vm%XXr  _  (#RonFoxsMotion#8069toDismissforVaguenessandOverbreadth.(3$ Y!XrXXX&Vm%XXr80XXdXXd8e  9  (Michigan statutes !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _750.479aFleeingand_Eluding._-750.479aMichigan statuteshttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.wpd3#37=CIQYag1.a.i.(1)(a)(i)1)a)0i)http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.htmlLawyerdude's Vagueness and Overbreadth Motion 8069 for Ron Fox>Attorney Douglas Palaschak(Lawyerdude papachristou Jacksonville Connally Graned sexsomnia ignace overbreadth fleeing eluding Palaschak Ron Fox Michigan vagueness motion V.vagueness overbeadth sexsomnia Ron Fox(;3$2#  0  .3  0  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vagueness.htmlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_sex  ,XrXXX&Vm%XXr d   d ((#(#(  Ae)1dE'01AAZ)1qdE#1Aeee1 e 2 z 3 Y 4 n 5 M  6  b  7 A   8 V  9 5  10 J  11 ) 12 > 13  14 2 15  16 & 17   18 " 19 $ 20 s & 21 !( 22 g#* 23 $| , 24 [&!. 25 'p#0 26 O)$2 27 *d&4 28http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7045.pdfHttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8066.htmlmailto:beggsandschisler@sbcglobal.nethttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7045.pdfhttp://ronfox.250free.com/ignace.html f!XXUSUS.,  _ InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct.853http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6201.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6203.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6202.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6207.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6204.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6205.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/6317.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/6318.htmlGrayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. at 108-09 & nu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Papachristou_Ԁv.CityofJacksonville (1971) K 4U O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html6O"  7t `Ԁ405U.S.156.Vaguelawsdefeatthe # intrinsicpromiseof,andfrustratetheessenceof,aconstitutionalregime.SPapachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1971) http://u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.htmlgggg)!dxdx dZZZZ)!dxdxhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html&0 d d  dP Pdiiii)!dxdx dkkkk)!dxdx dgg)! dxdxeeee)!dxdxoooo)!dxdx&P d dqqqq)!dxdx&p d Pdssss)!dxdx&p Pd duvuv)!dxdx3+0 d d d3+0 d d d  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Marbury_Ԁv.Madison (1803)4y( O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6Olel  7siԀ5U.S.(1 K Cranch.)137wMarbury v. Madison (1803) http://www.lawyerdude.neu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html " !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).Avaguestatutemaybe_overbroad_Ԁifits K uncertainboundariesleaveopenthepossibilityofpunishmentforprotectedconductandthus # leadcitizenstoavoidsuchprotectedactivityinordertosteerclearoftheuncertain \ proscriptions.|NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U.S. 288, 307 (1964). A vagueu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html c f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892)4 O  5  Phttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6O  7 "?Ԁ  #PI#143U.S.457;12_S.Ct_.511Rector, Etc., Of Holy Trinity Church v. United Statesu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68_S.Ct_.665.http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html  f!XXUSUS.,  _ Collinsv.Kentucky (1914)Tobaccocase.4 RO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6O  7 +Ԁ234U.S.  634,638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,393]Collins v. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 634, 638 , 34 S. Ct. u.s. supreme court cases 889Winters v. People of State of New York (1948) 333 Uu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html 1 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Giaccio_Ԁv.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86_S.Ct_.518.Giaccio v. State of Pennsylvania (1966) 382 U.S. 39u.s. supreme court cases 889 P f!XXPUSUS.,  __ United_ԀStatesv._Wigglesworth_ ,2Story,369,Fed._Cas_.No.16,690. f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151(1917)Gould v. Gould, 245 US., 151 (1917)u.s. supreme court cases 889 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Benziger_Ԁv.U.S. ,192U.S.38(1904).Benziger v. U.S., 192 U.S. 38 (1904)u.s. supreme court cases 889 ( f!XXPUSUS.,  _ AmericanNet&TwineCo.v._Worthington_ ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup.Ct.Rep.55American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U.S. 4u.s. supreme court cases 889 United States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 369, Fedu.s. supreme court cases 889mailto:BeggsandSchisler@sbcglobal.net f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Ricev.UnitedStates ,4C.C.A.104,10U.S.App.670,53Fed.910. Rice v. United States, 4 C. C. A. 104, 10 U. S. 9th circuit 09u8 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Sewell_Ԁv.Georgia ,435U.S.982(1978)  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ U.S.v.De_Cadena_ ,105_F.Supp_.202,204(1952).U.S. v. De Cadena, 105 F.Supp. 202, 204 (1952)fed dist court casesSewell v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 982 (1978u.s. supreme court cases 889Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1971) http://  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Clinev._Frink_ԀDairyCo., 274U.S.445,47S.Ct.681(1927) Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U.S. 445, 47 S. Ct. u.s. supreme court cases 889Connally v General Construction (1926) 269 U.S. 385 @ f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Karlan_Ԁ_v._ԀCityof_Cincinatti_ ,416U.S.924(1974). Karlan v. City of Cincinatti, 416 U.S. 924 (1974):u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ UnitedStatesv._Harriss_ ,347U.S.612,617(1954).United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 ( 1954)u.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ Coatesv.Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(1971).Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 614 ( 1971); u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Shuttlesworth_Ԁv.Birmingham ,382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965) K 4O  5  %&Rhttp://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6,O@tec  7tad~Ԁ#&R%#(IncludesphotographofReverendFred_Shuttlesworth_)Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87 , 90-91, 1u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ Baggettv._Bullitt_ ,377U.S.360,372(1964) Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 372 (1964)u.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Speiser_Ԁv.Randall ,357U.S.513,526(1958).Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 526 (1958)u.s. supreme court cases 889  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Zwickler_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Koota_ ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307 K (1964)."Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'a # governmentalpurposetocontrolorpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjecttostateregulation \ maynotbeachievedbymeanswhichsweepunnecessarilybroadlyandtherebyinvadethe 0 areaofprotectedfreedoms.Zwick "Overbreadth, on the other hand, 'offends the cu.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U.S. 288, 307 (1964)u.s. supreme court cases 889 C !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Dombrowski_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Pfister_ ,380U.S.479,486(1965)   p  Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 486 (1965)u.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Aptheker_Ԁv.SecretaryofState ,378U.S.500,508-509(1964).Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500 , 508-u.s. supreme court cases 889  !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ _Shelton_Ԁ_v._ԀTucker ,364U.S.479,488(1960). Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 (1960).u.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ CityofMesquitev._Alladin_'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283(1982).City of Mesquite v. Alladin's Castle, Inc., 455 U.Su.s. supreme court cases 889 !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _ TheVoid-for-VaguenessDoctrineintheSupremeCourt ,109U.Pa.L.Rev.67(1960).The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in the Supreme Courtschol treatises !XvxXXX&R%XXvxKe  _630F.2d,at1037630 F.2d, at 1037fed dist court casesdue process Y!XrXXX&Vm%XXr80XXdd8eee  9  _e)80XXdXXd8____RonFox,ProSe e InJailat5033rdstreet,BayCity,Michigan48708. " JailPhone:9898954066 z 4 O  5  lawyerdude1989@yahoo.com6DOX  7 *Ԁ 7 RonslocallawyerisPaul_Beggs_:9898933221 Y   XrX%&Vm Thismotionisnotnetfinished. #&Vm%XXr# M  Thismotionis4& T O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.pdf6O-  7 [Ԁ  b  42 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.html6O  7 BԀ0    (#(# 0  0` (#(#4/ ` O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8069.wpd6O1  7 4_ԀA  ` (#` (#   XrX%&Vm #&Vm%XXr#@XrX%&Vm 18thJudicialCircuitofMichigan #&Vm%XXr#Ԉ x  @ 1230WashingtonAvenue,BayCityMI48708. 5  @  CourtofJudgeWilliamJ.Caprathe    @ 4 O  5  http://www.co.bay.mi.us/bay/home.nsf/Public/Circuit_Court.htm6O  7  Ԁ J  @dd8988954265.Fax:9898954099 l 5 5(  V(#(#(People ' v  RonFox < Casenumber:20032752 ' DistrictCasenumber:03fy10859SN  Document#8069Version0.901 ^ *30thMotionforRonFox   XrX%&Vm0 *   *(#*(#  MotiontoDismisstheComplaintforVagueness 0 andOverbreadthoftheunderlyingstatute.#&Vm%XXr #  R Date:0 * Tuesday"$US,  , $28November2006.g *(#*(# Time:0 * 9a.m.     2   $!*(#*(# Place:0 * CourtRoomofJudgeCapratheF"*(#*(#  # @Jz   AA @(  V  (@> > XrX%&Vm Helpiscomingonedaylate.SongbySamPhilips. #&Vm%XXr<#Ԁ@@  Y# http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sam_Phillips_%28singer%29 {$   XrX%&VmMotiontoDismisstheComplaintforVaguenessandOverbreadthofthe  & underlyingstatute.#&Vm%XXr=#  0 !M'    Atthevenuedesignatedinthecaptionoratsuchothervenueasthecourtshall o" ( designateIwillaskthecourttoDismisstheComplaintforVaguenessandOverbreadthofthe #%* underlyingstatute.Iherebywaivemyrighttoaspeedytrialasneeded.MylawyerPalaschak $@ , hasnotyetbeeninformedofthestatutenumberfortheunderlyingaccusation.Althoughmy %[!. locallawyerRobertDunnepromisedtosendPalaschakthefileifauthorizedbyme,hefailedto &v"0 doso. '#2 Signed_______________________RonFox.Friday,October27,2006. )$4 @|| DemandforRenewedTrialSettingConference.ThistimeIdemandtobethere . ,*%6   OnMondayOctober9thIexpectedtobeincourt.Iaminformedthatthecourthelda G+&8 trialsettingconferencewithoutmypresence.Istronglyobject.Thisviolatesmydueprocess b,': andothercriminalrightsundertheMichiganConstitutionandtheU.S.Constitution.Iamnot e readyfortrial.Ihaveamultitudeofpretrialmotionstobeheard.  Signed_____________________RonFox.Friday,October27,2006. 6 AZ) xdExA X XrX%&Vm TableofContents #&Vm%XXr#  " _  H  Hd0     MotiontoDismisstheComplaintforVaguenessandOverbreadthoftheunderlyingstatute. m #>(#.(#(##Page1of16Hd݌  * Ќ  H  Hݎ0     NoticeofConcurrentandPlannedMotionsinthiscase. #>(#.@(#(##Page2of16Hݎ݌ L   Ќ  H  H݅0     HereiswhatIwant:IwantthecourttoVacatetheTrialDateandOrderLawyerBeggsto    FileWrittenMotionsorWithdraw. #>(#.0(#(##Page3of16H݅݌  a  Ќ  H  H0     StatementoftheCase.IamthevictimofPoliceBrutality.#>(#.E(#(##Page3of16H݌    Ќ  !  !0  0` (#(#    IwillprevailandbepaidjustlikethewomaninSouthCarolina! #>(#.P` (#` (##Page3of16!݌ @   Ќ  !  !0  0` (#(#    Theelementsofthecrimearenotthere. #>(#.7` (#` (##Page3of16!݌   Ќ  H  H0     ProceduralPosture #>(#.P P (#(##Page4of16H݌ U  Ќ  !  !0  0` (#(#    Wearenotreadyfortrial;mylawyerhasnotevenseenthefileyetdespite w  requestingitinMarchoverahalfyearago! #>(#.xxB` (#` (##Page4of16!݌ 4  Ќ  !  !0  0` (#(#    PaulBeggshasaconflictofinterest.Ifiredhimoverayearago. #>(#.&&S` (#` (##Page4of16!/݌   Ќ  !  !- 0  0` (#(#    PaulBeggsisdoingnothing....again.#>(#.8` (#` (##Page4of16!- H ݌ I  Ќ  H  H%!0     DeclarationofAttorneyDouglasPalaschak#>(#.ZZ3(#(##Page4of16H%!@!݌ k Ќ  !  ! "0  0` (#(#    RonsSt.Ignacecasestartedthissameway:Lawyerignoranceandneglectand ( multipleincompetentlawyers,judgesandprosecutorsoverthecourseof3  years. #>(#.p p ` (#` (##Page5of16! "$"݌ = Ќ  !  !#0  0` (#(#    Ronsdisease:Sexsomnia.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_sex#>(#.P` (#` (##Page5of16!##݌ _ Ќ  !  !$0  0` (#(#    InstrumentofOppressionReducetoAttemptevenifIllogical. #>(#.jjN` (#` (##Page6of16!$$݌  Ќ  H  H%0     PointsandAuthoritiesSupportingDismissalonVoidforVaguenessandOverbreadth t #>(#.(#(##Page6of16H%%݌ 1 Ќ  H  H&0     TableofAuthoritiescitedherein: #>(#.,(#(##Page6of16H&'݌ S Ќ  !  !'0  0` (#(#    U.S.SupremeCourtcasescitedherein: #>(#.5` (#` (##Page6of16!''݌  Ќ  !  !(0  0` (#(#    MichiganStatuteCitedherein: #>(#.dd-` (#` (##Page8of16!((݌ h Ќ  !  !)0  0` (#(#    TheLogicisSimple.Driving1milehomeisnotFleeingandEluding.  % #>(#.` ` ` (#` (##Page8of16!))݌ G  Ќ  !  !*0  0` (#(#    Therearetwopossiblestatutes:750.479aand257.602a.AttorneysDunnand ! BeggshaverefusedtotellmylawyerPalaschakwhichstatuteisusedto \" accuseme. #>(#.@ @ ` (#` (##Page8of16!*+݌ ~# Ќ      ,0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   MichiganVehicleCodeExcept:Act300of1949:257.602aFailuretostop ;$ atsignalofpoliceorconservationofficer: #>(#.  E (# (##Page9of16 ,,݌ % Ќ  !  !.0  0` (#(#    CommentoftheProsecutingAttorneyAssociationProvesthatRonwasnot P& attemptingtoelude. #vv=(#.88(` (#` (##Page11of16!. .݌ r ' Ќ  H  HK/0     AppendixATextofarticlebyMichiganProsecutorreFleeingandEluding.  /!( #vv=(#.(#(##Page11of16HK/f/݌ !) Ќ  H  Hn00     AppendixCLinktoStoryaboutEdCzuprynski,oneofmyotherdonothinglocallawyers: "D* #vv=(#.(#(##Page15of16Hn00݌ f#+ Ќ  X_______AZ) xdE]%xA ${ - @x x   NoticeofConcurrentandPlannedMotionsinthiscase.  2Ԉ %8!.  0(#330"43"  4332#  1  .3  0    IplantoseekreviewoftheexorbitantbailinmycasesetbyMagistrateBleau.4333݌&S"0(#(# Ќ  "43"  4342#  2  .3  0    Iwillmovethestrikethecomplaint.4344݌'n#2(#(# Ќ  "43"  4352#  3  .3  0    Iwillchallengethisstatute. h      p      x 4355݌($4(#(# Ќ  "43"  4362#  4  .3  0    Iplantoobtainetranscripts.4366݌ *%6(#(# Ќ  "43"  4372#  5  .3  0    Iplantomovetodismiss.4377݌$+&8(#(# Ќ  "43"  4382#  6  .3  0    Well,therearealotofmotionsthatIplantomake.4388݌?,':(#(# Ќ  AZ) xdExA e @  HereiswhatIwant:IwantthecourttoVacatetheTrialDateandOrderLawyer_Beggs_Ԁto  FileWrittenMotionsorWithdraw.  : = 9  @X X   XrX%&VmStatementoftheCase.IamthevictimofPoliceBrutality. #&Vm%XXr>;#  1;Ԉ    Thiscasearisesfromatrafficstop.OnMonday27February,2006,ataround9:30a.m. 0  Iwasdrivingmyvansafelyaround1.11milesfrommyhouse.OfficerLochinskinoticedthat K   mylicenseplateshadexpired5monthspreviously.Hesignaledmetostop.Istopped.Idid f   notfleeandelude.Istopped.Lochinskiinterviewedmeandbeganwritingaticket.Hedidnot   arrestme.Therewasnoemergency.Iwasmerelyunabletoaffordtheroadtaxdueto  7  extremepoverty.Theremedywouldbepaymentofthetax R  Ѐ  ThereafterIsawthewreckerapproaching.Ihavebeendownthisroadbefore.Iwas m  notunderarrest.Ihadyielded.Theofficercouldhavearrestedme.Hechosenotto.Hehad   alltheinformationtowriteaticketandhadwrittenaticketandwaswalkingtomycar.Ichose   togo1.11milestoaplaceofsafetymyhome.Idroveslowlyandsafelywestboundoverthe # waterfromtheintersectionofMcKinleyandJacksontomyhomeat503SouthDewittSt.,Bay > City.DouglasPalaschakplottedthemaponMapQuest.Thisdistanceis1.11miles. Y   Ipulledintomydriveway.HavingbeenaccostedbypoliceinthesameplaceIassumed t  thepositiononthegroundoutsidemyvan.Ihavepreviouslyfiledasection1983casefora *" previouspoliceabuseofthisnatureatmyhouse.Thecaseispublishedatthefollowinglink: E$ 4= O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7045.pdf6}BOB  7 8BԀ `& @66   XrX%&Vm IwillprevailandbepaidjustlikethewomaninSouthCarolina! #&Vm%XXrC#  uCԈ {(   InamoreegregiouschaseinSouthCarolina,awomandrove8milesbeingchasedbya * policeofficer.ThishappenedonJanuary9,1996.ItwasshownonCourtTV.Theincidentis , capturedonadashcamandshownonYouTubeat 1. http://youtube.com/watch?v=I4FPlicf4Xg&search=cop%20woman%20stop L0   This11yearveterancopwasfired!Thewomandriverwhorefusedtostopwas g 2 awardedasubstantialjudgment.Iwastreatedworsethatthiswomanwas. !4 @    Theelementsofthecrimearenotthere.  FԈ "86   Theelementsofthecrimearenotthere.Thisisthesubjectofaseparatemotionwhich #S8 willbeatthefollowinglink:4> Z O  5  0  %&VmHttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/8066.html#&Vm%G#6GOG  7 GԀ$n :(#(# Signed_______________________RonFoxTuesday,October10,2006 %!< AZ) xdE'xA  '"> @!  & l ProceduralPosture  IԈ $(#@ @  Wearenotreadyfortrial;mylawyerhasnotevenseenthefileyetdespiterequestingit ?)$B inMarchoverahalfyearago!  I Z*%D 'l$(I  I,RonFox,wasputinjailMarch28,2006,byAttorney/MagistrateThomasBleau989 u+'F 895-4231onthebasisofatrafficstoponFebruary27amonthearlier.AlthoughIwas e deemedsafeandreliableenoughtobereleasedimmediatelyuponbooking,Bleausetmybail  atanunconstitutionallyhighamounttherebyprecludingmefrommyconstitutionalrighttobail. 6 Bleausaidthatmyshortdrivetomyhomeindicatedaflightrisk.Thisisludicrous.Bleauwas Q thesamemagistratewhosentpolicetomyhouseonJanuary25thafterImistakenlyfailedto l appearforatrafficticket.      Nobodyhassuccessfullyarguedthisissueoffairbail.Whenmylawyer,Douglas    PalaschakcalledBleauaroundJanuary25th,BleauhunguponPalaschak.Palaschaks "  contentionwasthattherewasnosignedwarrantandnoprobablecause. =    FromthebeginningofhiscaseandonpreviouscasesPalaschakhasattemptedto X  obtaintherecordsofmycase. s    PalaschaktalkedtoAttorneyRobertDunne.Dunnedemandedwrittenauthorization )  beforesendingacopyofthefiletoPalaschak.IsignedanauthorizationandGaildelivereditto D  Dunnesoffice.DunneneverdidgiveacopyofthefiletoPalaschakoranybody.NowDunne _ isoffthecaseandPaulBeggsisonthecase.Samemodusoperandi:1.Nomotions;2. z FailuretocooperatewithmeandmylawyerPalaschak.  @  Paul_Beggs_Ԁhasaconflictofinterest.Ifiredhimoverayearago.  QԈ     Paul_Beggs_Ԁwasmylawyerayearago.IdonthavemyrecordswithmeandthereforeI 0" cannotcitetheexactdate.Iworkedhardtofirehimthen.Thelawforbidsthathebe K$ appointedagain! f& @8 8   Paul_Beggs_Ԁisdoingnothing....again.  S  (   Paul_Beggs_Ԁcameuptoseemeinjailontheeveningofthedaythathewasappointed. 7* Hehadnoplan.Hepromisedtoreturnthenextday.Heneverdidreturn.Hehasnoplan.He R, haswrittennothing. m. AZ) xdEjxA 0 @   DeclarationofAttorneyDouglasPalaschak  U   2   I,DouglasPalaschak,declarethefollowingunderpenaltyofperjury: #!4   ThereissomuchtosayaboutRonsmanycases. >"6   IhavesufferedthesameinjusticeasRonFox.IwasarrestedbytheFBIonMarch14, Y#8 1999atmyfarmhomeonafalseallegationof fleeingsamemurkywordaswasusedin t$ : Ronscase.Immediatelyuponmybeinglockedupinjailthefederalchargewasdropped. %*!< Actuallyitwasafakecasefromafakestackoffakecasenumbersheldbyamagistratein &E"> SantaBarbara. '`#@   UseofsuchillegaltricksisroutinefortheFBIasdocumentedonpage291inthebook ({$B  BadBoybyGaryM._Laverge_,St.MartinsPaperbacks,1999,currentlyonsaleat_WalMart._ )%D   Iwasheldon$500,000bail,extradited2000miles,andthenreleasedafterservingthe +&F maximumtimefortheallegedcrime.Thereafterajuryacquittedme.Whopaysformylost4 1,'H months?Isued. e   RonFoxselectedmefromallthelawyersintheUnitedStatestobehislawyerin  December2003 almost3yearsago .Ihavepublishedabriefautobiographyinthe 6 appendix. Q   SincethenIhavedonewhatnootherlawyerscoulddoforRonFox:IfiguredouthisSt. l IgnacecaseandIfiledaSection1983caseforhim.Wewillultimatelyprevail.Hereisalinkto    thefederalcivilrightscase:4B O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7045.pdf6 ]O4]  7Nb]Ԁ      InFebruaryorMarchRonFoxinformedmethatRobertDunnehasbeenappointed.I "  calledDunneandtalkedtohimpersonally.Iaskedforacopyofthefileincludingthepolice =  reports. `  X    DunnebalkedsayingthatheneededwrittenauthorizationfromRoneventhoughIhave s  beenRon'slawyerforseveralyears.RonandRon'swifeGailcollaboratedanddelivered )  writtenauthorizationtoDunne'soffice.StillDunnesentnothingtome. D  @  RonsSt.Ignacecasestartedthissameway:Lawyerignoranceandneglectandmultiple _ incompetentlawyers,judgesandprosecutorsoverthecourseof3years.  i` z   RonFox'slegalproblemsbeganbecausehisassignedlawyersinSt.Ignaceignoredthe  legaltheoryinhiscase.Hereislinktothemotion:4CO  5  http://ronfox.250free.com/ignace.html6bOb  7 IbԀ   @__ XrX%&Vm  Ronsdisease:_Sexsomnia_.48 O  5  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sleep_sex  c6fcOzc   7 cԀ #&Vm%XXrb#Ԉ 0"   Ronhasamedicallyrecognizedvariationofsleepwalkingdiseasecalled _sexsomnia_.It K$ isavarietyofsleepwalking. f&   Ronsgrandmotherdiedaround1997.Ronwenttothefuneralandstayedovernightat ( thehomeofhisbrotherinSt.Ignace.UnbeknownsttoRon,his8yearoldniecejumpedinbed 7* betweenRonandRon'snephewwhowassharingtheniece'sbedwithRon.Theniecehad R, beentemporarilyassignedtothenephew'sbed. m. ЀRonwokeupthenextmorningandwenthome. 0 ЀSomeweekslaterhereturnedtoSt.Ignacetosocializewithhisbrother'sfamilyincluding  2 the8yearoldniece. #!4 ЀFourmonthslaterthenieceallegedlyreportedtoherMomthatRonhastouchedher >"6 underpantswhileshewasinbedwithhim.TheniecetestifiedthatRonappearedtobe Y#8 sleeping.Ronhadnoknowledgethatshehadevenbeeninbedwithhim.Theniecetestified t$ : thatshejumpedinbedinthemiddleofthenightafterusingthetoilet.Shetestifiedthatsheleft %*!< thebedaround20minuteslater.Thetestimonyisundisputed:Ronsleptthroughthisevent. &E"> ЀThetrialwaspendingduringthecourseof3years.Therewere3consecutivepublic '`#@ defenders,3consecutiveprosecutors,and3consecutivejudgesoverthecourseof3years. ({$B NoneoftheminvestigatedRon'sdiseasealthoughRontoldthemaboutit.Ronhadbeen )%D informedofthediseasebyhiswifeandhisexwife. +&F @; ;   InstrumentofOppressionReducetoAttemptevenifIllogical. ԱkԈ 1,'H ЀAfter3yearsoftripstoSt.IgnacetheypersuadedRontopleadguiltytoattempt,although e thatwasfactuallyimpossiblebecauseonecannotattemptwhatoneisunconsciousofdoing.  Ronwouldservenotimeinjailandwouldbeonprobationfortwoyears.Rondidnot 6 understandthathewouldberequiredtoregisterasasexoffenderforlife.Michigan'ssex Q registryisuniqueinthatallegedoffendersarealllumpedinthesameclasssothatRoncould l beaserialrapistforallthatthepublicknows.    ЀIlongagopostedthestoryandpolicereportsintheSt.Ignacecase.Iwrotethemotion.    Weareclosetolitigatingthatcaseandundoingthewrong. "  ЀThelocalpoliceareprejudiced/biasedagainstRonbecauseofmisunderstandingregarding =  themysterioussecretstatusimposedbythebadMichiganlawwhichwastemporarily X  overturnedatonetimebyJudgeVictoria. s  ЀIfiledafederalcaseinthisregard. )  ЀThefleeingandeludingaccusationisnotfounded.OnceagainMichiganlawisoutoflinewith D  thelawfromtherestofthecountry.Alegislaturemaynotchangethemeaningofordinary _ wordsandneithermaytheMichigancourtsintheirinterpretationbutthatispreciselywhathas z happenedwithFleeingandEluding.  ЀThereisawellknownSouthCarolinacaseonYouTubewhereacoppushedawoman   tothegroundforfailingtostop-evenworseactionbythedriverthanwhatRondid.Inthe 0" woman'scasethecopwasfiredandshereceivedaheftypaymentfromthepolice.Thisiswhat K$ shouldhappeninRon'scase. f&   IwouldhaveactedsoonerbutRobertDunnerefusedtoforwardthefilesandthenhe ( gotoffthecase. 7* ЀRon'strialwouldbepremature. R,   IsenttheforegoingexplanationbyemailtoAttorney_Beggs_ԀonMondayOct9,2006to m. hisemailaddressat4viH O  5  BeggsandSchisler@sbcglobal.net6huO|uegis  7auԀ 0 AZ) xdE xA  2 @oo  XrX%&VmPointsandAuthoritiesSupportingDismissalonVoidforVaguenessand #!4 Overbreadth#&Vm%XXrv# unv  !{5   XrX%&Vm TableofAuthoritiescitedherein: #&Vm%XXrw# 0sw "86   U.S.SupremeCourtcasescitedherein: 0s=x Z#7 '0s_  (   ( x  *ConnallyvGeneralConstruction(1926)269U.S.385vv=(#.>Page14of16( xx݈ $8 Ќ̌  (   ( y  *dueprocessBB(#.Page13of16,Page14of16,Page15of16( yy݈ %,!: Ќ̌  x  (   ( z  _ AmericanNet&TwineCo.v._Worthington_ ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup.Ct.Rep._55  '"< vv=(#. Page14of16( zz݈ 'c#= Ќ̌  (   ( {  _ _Aptheker_Ԁv.SecretaryofState ,378U.S.500,508-509_(1964).vv=(#.@@HPage15of16( {{݈ B)$? Ќ̌  (   ( }  _ _Baggett_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Bullitt_ ,377U.S.360,372_(1964)vv=(#.6Page14of16( }}݈ *W&A Ќ̌  (   ( U~  _ _Benziger_Ԁv.U.S. ,192U.S.38_(1904).vv=(#./Page14of16(U~p~݈ 6,'C Ќ  (   ( c  _ CityofMesquitev._Alladin_'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283_(1982).vv=(#.PPJPage15of16(c~݈ e Ќ̌  (   (   _ Clinev._Frink_ԀDairyCo., 274U.S.445,47S.Ct.681_(1927)vv=(#.FPage14of16( ݈ z Ќ̌  (   (   _ Coatesv.Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(_1971).vv=(#.tt:Page14of16( ݈́ Y Ќ̌  (   (   _ Collinsv.Kentucky (1914)Tobaccocase.4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6(O<  7 "gԀ n 234U.S.634,638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,_393]vv=(#.?Page13of16( ł݈  + Ќ̌  (   (   _ _Dombrowski_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Pfister_ ,380U.S.479,486(1965)   p vv=(#.pp2Page15of16_( ф݈    Ќ̌  (   ( &  _ _Giaccio_Ԁv.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86_S.Ct_._518.vv=(#.MPage13of16( &A݈    Ќ̌  (   ( r  _ Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151_(1917)vv=(#.-Page13of16( r݈   Ќ̌  (   ( ^  _ _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.44Q O  5   %&Vmhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html6 O  7 "IԀ_#&Vm% S# x  vv=(#. Page15of16( ^y݈ 5  Ќ̌  (   (   _ InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct._853vv=(#.""TPage13of16( ݈ J  Ќ̌  (   (   _ _Karlan_Ԁ_v._ԀCityof_Cincinatti_ ,416U.S.924_(1974).vv=(#.<Page14of16( Ӌ݈ ) Ќ̌  (   (   _ _Marbury_Ԁv.Madison (1803)4y"O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6Olel  7siԀ5U.S.(1 > Cranch.)_137vv=(#.Page15of16( .݈ ` Ќ̌  (   (   _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307_(1964).vv=(#.5Page15of16( ,݈ u Ќ̌  (   (   _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).Avaguestatutemaybe_overbroad_Ԁifits T uncertainboundariesleaveopenthepossibilityofpunishmentforprotectedconductandthus  leadcitizenstoavoidsuchprotectedactivityinordertosteerclearoftheuncertain i proscriptions.vv=(#.* * Page15of16_(  ݈ & Ќ̌  (   ( B  _ _Papachristou_Ԁv.CityofJacksonville (1971)   4U O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html6O   7FԀ405U.S.156.Vaguelawsdefeatthe ]! intrinsicpromiseof,andfrustratetheessenceof,aconstitutional_regime.BB<(#.VPage14of16, " vv=(#Page15of16( B]݈ <# Ќ̌  (   (   _ Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892) Q% 4 O  5   %&Vmhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6Oҕ  7 ^Ԁ#&Vm% #143U.S.457;12_S.Ct_._511vv=(#.DDUPage13of16( 3݈ s & Ќ̌  (   ( ~  _ _Sewell_Ԁv.Georgia ,435U.S.982_(1978)vv=(#.0Page14of16( ~݈ !( Ќ̌  (   (   _ _Shelton_Ԁ_v._ԀTucker ,364U.S.479,488_(1960).vv=(#.^^6Page15of16( ݈ g#* Ќ̌  (   ( ™  _ _Shuttlesworth_Ԁv.Birmingham ,382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965) $| , 4O  5   %&Vmhttp://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6Otec  7tadԀ#&Vm% #(IncludesphotographofReverendFred_Shuttlesworth) %9!- vv=(#. Page14of16( ™ݙ݈ [&!. Ќ̌  (   ( {  _ _Speiser_Ԁv.Randall ,357U.S.513,526_(1958).vv=(#.7Page15of16( {݈ 'p#0 Ќ̌  _(   (    UnitedStatesv._Harriss_ ,347U.S.612,617(1954).vv=(#.>Page14of16( ݈ O)$2 Ќ̌  (   (    UnitedStatesv._Wigglesworth_ ,2Story,369,Fed._Cas_.No.16,690.vv=(#.LPage14of16( ݈ *d&4 Ќ̌  (   ( ɟ   Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68_S.Ct_.665.vv=(#...SPage13of16(ɟ݈ C,'6 Ќ  (   ( ۠   _Zwickler_Ԁv._Koota_ ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307 e (1964)."Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'a " governmentalpurposetocontrolorpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjecttostateregulation z maynotbeachievedbymeanswhichsweepunnecessarilybroadlyandtherebyinvadethe 7 areaofprotectedfreedoms.vv=(#. &Page15of16( ݈۠ Y Ќ̌  tzAZ) xdEP xA n   MichiganStatuteCitedherein:   + ,  (   (   257.602aFleeingandEluding.>(#.)Page9of16( ݈ M  Ќ̌  (   ( ?  750.479aFleeingandEluding.>(#.)Page8of16( ?Z݈  b  Ќ̌  xAZ) xdE{xA   @  TheLogicisSimple.1RonStopped.2_Therafter_ԀDriving1milehomeisnotFleeingand V  Eluding. ,s x  @  TheAppendedArticlebyMichiganProsecutorsisEnlightening:TheFleeingandEluding 5  isnotsuccessfulunlessthedriversuccessfullyEludes.Andanattemptisnotamere   attemptunlessRonfailstoachieveallthatRonintended.Ronachievedallthathe J  intended. V l   Thebettermotionistheconcurrentdemurrer/_motion_Ԁtostrikethecomplaintforfailureto ) stateacauseofaction.Ronintendedmerelytodrive1.1milestothesafeplaceathishouse.  @  Therearetwopossiblestatutes:750.479aand257.602a.AttorneysDunnand_Beggs_Ԉ ` haverefusedtotellmylawyerPalaschakwhichstatuteisusedtoaccuseme.    . 750.479astatesinitsentirety: u ! ! 0(#330"43"  432#  1  .3  0    ݀Adriverofamotorvehiclewhoisgivenbyhand,voice,emergencylight,orsirena 2 visualoraudiblesignalbyapoliceorconservationofficer,actinginthelawful T performanceofhisorherduty,directingthedrivertobringhisorhermotorvehicletoa  stopshallnotwillfullyfailtoobeythatdirectionbyincreasingthespeedofthevehicle, i extinguishingthelightsofthevehicle,orotherwiseattemptingtofleeoreludethepolice & orconservationofficer.Thissubsectiondoesnotapplyunlessthepoliceorconservation H officergivingthesignalisinuniformandtheofficer'svehicleisidentifiedasanofficial   policeordepartmentofnaturalresourcesvehicle.43݌]!(#(# Ќ  "43"  432#  2  .3  0    Exceptasprovidedinsubsection3,4,or5,anindividualwhoviolatessubsection1is " guiltyoffourth-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornot <# morethan2yearsorafineofnotmorethan$2,000.00,orboth.43݌$(#(# Ќ  "43"  43ұ2#  3  .3  0    Exceptasprovidedinsubsection4or5,anindividualwhoviolatessubsection1isguilty Q% ofthird-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornotmore s & than5yearsorafineofnotmorethan$5,000.00,orboth,if1ormoreofthefollowing 0!' circumstancesapply:43ұ݌!((#(# Ќ  ";"  ;0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#  Theviolationresultsinacollisionoraccident.;"݌"E)` (#` (# Ќ  ";"  ;0  2#  b  .3  0` (#(#  ݀Aportionoftheviolationoccurredinanareawherethespeedlimitis35miles g#* anhourorless,whetherthatspeedlimitispostedorimposedasamatteroflaw.;0݌$$+` (#` (# Ќ  ";"  ;0  2#  c  .3  0` (#(#  Theindividualhasapriorconvictionforfourth-degreefleeingandeluding, $| , attemptedfourth-degreefleeingandeluding,orfleeingandeludingundera %9!- currentorformerlawofthisstateprohibitingsubstantiallysimilarconduct.;Ŷ݌[&!.` (#` (# Ќ  "43"  432#  4  .3  0    Exceptasprovidedinsubsection5,anindividualwhoviolatessubsection1isguiltyof '"/ second-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornotmore 'p#0 than10yearsorafineofnotmorethan$10,000.00,orboth,if1ormoreofthe (-$1 followingcircumstancesapply:43݌O)$2(#(# Ќ  ";"  ;0  2#  a  .3  0` (#(#  Theviolationresultsinseriousimpairmentofabodyfunctionofanindividual.;Ӻ݌ *%3` (#` (# Ќ  ";"  ;ӻ0  2#  b  .3  0` (#(#  Theindividualhas1ormorepriorconvictionsforfirst-,second-,orthird-degree *d&4 fleeingandeluding,attemptedfirst-,second-,orthird-degreefleeingand +!'5 eluding,orfleeingandeludingunderacurrentorformerlawofthisstate C,'6 prohibitingsubstantiallysimilarconduct.;ӻ݌e` (#` (# Ќ  ";"  ;0  2#  c  .3  0` (#(#  Theindividualhasanycombinationof2ormorepriorconvictionsfor " fourth-degreefleeingandeluding,attemptedfourth-degreefleeingandeluding, z orfleeingandeludingunderacurrentorformerlawofthisstateprohibiting 7 substantiallysimilarconduct.;/݌Y` (#` (# Ќ  "43"  432#  5  .3  0    Iftheviolationresultsinthedeathofanotherindividual,anindividualwhoviolates  subsection1isguiltyoffirst-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishableby n imprisonmentfornotmorethan15yearsorafineofnotmorethan$15,000.00,orboth.43K݌ +(#(# Ќ  "43"  432#  6  .3  0    Uponaconvictionforaviolationorattemptedviolationundersubsection(2)or(3),the M  secretaryofstateshallsuspendtheindividual'soperator'sorchauffeur'slicenseas    providedinsection319oftheMichiganvehiclecode,1949PA300,_MCL_Ԁ257.319.43>݌ b (#(# Ќ  "43"  43"2#  7  .3  0    Uponaconvictionforaviolationorattemptedviolationundersubsection(4)or(5),the    secretaryofstateshallrevoketheindividual'soperator'sorchauffeur'slicenseas A   providedinsection303oftheMichiganvehiclecode,1949PA300,_MCL_Ԁ257.303.43"O݌ (#(# Ќ  "43"  4322#  8  .3  0    Exceptasotherwiseprovided,aconvictionunderthissectiondoesnotprohibita V  convictionandsentenceunderanyotherapplicableprovisionforconductarisingoutof x  thesametransaction.Aconvictionundersubsection(2),(3),(4),or(5)prohibitsa 5  convictionundersection602aoftheMichiganvehiclecode,1949PA300,_MCL_   257.602a,forconductarisingoutofthesametransaction.432_݌J (#(# Ќ  "43"  432#  9  .3  0    Asusedinthissection, seriousimpairmentofabodyfunctionmeansthattermas l definedinsection58coftheMichiganvehiclecode,1949PA300,_MCL_Ԁ257.58c.43݌)(#(# Ќ  History:Add.1966,Act299,Eff.Mar.10,1967;--Am.1988,Act407,Eff.Mar.30,1989;--Am. ` 1996,Act586,Eff.June1,1997;--Am.1998,Act344,Eff.Oct.1,1999;--Am.2002,Act270,  Eff.July15,20022006LegislativeCouncil,StateofMichigan u AZ) xdExA 2 ̀  MichiganVehicleCodeExcept:Act300of1949:257.602aFailuretostopatsignalof  policeorconservationofficer: 9 i __ % 257.602astatesinitsentirety: H ! ! 0(#33 0"43"  432#  1  .3  0    Adriverofamotorvehiclewhoisgivenbyhand,voice,emergencylight,orsirena   visualoraudiblesignalbyapoliceorconservationofficer,actinginthelawful ]! performanceofhisorherduty,directingthedrivertobringhisorhermotorvehicletoa " stopshallnotwillfullyfailtoobeythatdirectionbyincreasingthespeedofthemotor <# vehicle,extinguishingthelightsofthemotorvehicle,orotherwiseattemptingtofleeor $ eludetheofficer.Thissubsectiondoesnotapplyunlessthepoliceorconservation Q% officergivingthesignalisinuniformandtheofficer'svehicleisidentifiedasanofficial s & policeordepartmentofnaturalresourcesvehicle.430݌0!'(#(# Ќ  (2)Exceptasprovidedinsubsection(3),(4),or(5),anindividualwhoviolatessubsection(1)is "E) guiltyoffourth-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornotmore g#* than2yearsorafineofnotmorethan$500.00,orboth. $$+ (3)Exceptasprovidedinsubsection(4)or(5),anindividualwhoviolatessubsection(1)isguilty %9!- ofthird-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornotmorethan5 [&!. yearsorafineofnotmorethan$1,000.00,orboth,if1ormoreofthefollowingcircumstances '"/ apply: 'p#0 (a)Theviolationresultsinacollisionoraccident. O)$2 (b)Aportionoftheviolationoccurredinanareawherethespeedlimitis35milesanhouror *d&4 less,whetherthatspeedlimitispostedorimposedasamatteroflaw. +!'5  C,'6 (c)Theindividualhasapriorconvictionforfourth-degreefleeingandeluding,attempted e fourth-degreefleeingandeluding,orfleeingandeludingunderacurrentorformerlawofthis " stateprohibitingsubstantiallysimilarconduct. z (4)Exceptasprovidedinsubsection(5),anindividualwhoviolatessubsection(1)isguiltyof Y second-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonmentfornotmorethan10  yearsorafineofnotmorethan$5,000.00,orboth,if1ormoreofthefollowingcircumstances n apply:  + (a)Theviolationresultsinseriousinjurytoanindividual.    _(b)Theindividualhas1ormorepriorconvictionsforfirst-,second-,orthird-degreefleeingand    eluding,attemptedfirst-,second-,orthird-degreefleeingandeluding,orfleeingandeluding A   underacurrentorformerlawofthisstateprohibitingsubstantiallysimilarconduct.   (c)Theindividualhasanycombinationof2ormorepriorconvictionsforfourth-degreefleeing x  andeluding,attemptedfourth-degreefleeingandeluding,orfleeingandeludingundera 5  currentorformerlawofthisstateprohibitingsubstantiallysimilarconduct.   (5)Iftheviolationresultsinthedeathofanotherindividual,anindividualwhoviolates l subsection(1)isguiltyoffirst-degreefleeingandeluding,afelonypunishablebyimprisonment ) fornotmorethan15yearsorafineofnotmorethan$10,000.00,orboth.  (6)Aconvictionunderthissectiondoesnotprohibitaconvictionandsentenceunderanyother ` applicableprovision,exceptsection479a(2),(3),(4),or(5)oftheMichiganpenalcode,1931  PA328,MCL750.479a,forconductarisingoutofthesametransaction. u (7)Asusedinthissection, seriousinjurymeansaphysicalinjurythatisnotnecessarily T permanent,butthatconstitutesseriousbodilydisfigurementorthatseriouslyimpairsthe  functioningofabodyorganorlimb.Seriousinjuryincludes,butisnotlimitedto,1ormoreof i thefollowing: & (a)Lossofalimboruseofalimb.   (b)Lossofahand,foot,finger,orthumboruseofahand,foot,finger,orthumb. " (c)Lossofaneyeorearoruseofaneyeorear. $ (d)Lossorsubstantialimpairmentofabodilyfunction. s & (e)Seriousvisibledisfigurement. !( (f)Acomatosestatethatlastsformorethan3days. g#* (g)Measurablebraindamageormentalimpairment. $| , (h)Askullfractureorotherseriousbonefracture. [&!. _(_i_)_Subdural_Ԁhemorrhageorhematoma. 'p#0 History:Add.1966,Act203,Eff.Sept.1,1966;--Am.1968,Act160,Eff.Nov.15,1968;--Am.  *%3 1981,Act159,Eff.Mar.31,1982;--Am.1988,Act406,Eff.Mar.30,1989;--Am.1996,Act *d&4 587,Eff.June1,1997;--Am.1998,Act347,Eff.Oct.1,1999;--Am.1999,Act73,Eff.Oct.1, +!'5 19992006LegislativeCouncil,StateofMichigan C,'6 AZ) xdExA e @  CommentoftheProsecutingAttorneyAssociationProvesthatRonwasnotattempting " toelude. rms z   RonFoxisinnocentonceagain.First,hestoppedimmediatelyuponsignal.Hewaiting. 7 Thecopwrotetheticket.Rondrove1.1milestohishomebeforeacceptingtheticket. Y 4 O  5  http://_www.paamtrafficsafety.com_/_hot_topics_/_fleeing_and_eluding.htm_Ԁ6O  7 I  AlsoseeabadarticleinthequasiofficialMichiganbookwrittenbyabadlawyer.  + AZ) xdE xA M  ____  DejaVu.JustlikeinJanuary2004,Ronisbeingpressuredtobetesteda4thtimeafter    3forensicpsychologytestsreturnedidenticalresults. %     Broadlyspeakingadefendantenjoystherightagainstselfincriminationandarightto @   speakforhimself. FarettavCalifornia (1975)422U.S.806.HereisalinktotheFaretta [  case:4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/faretta.html6>OR  7 ԀItappearsthatthepurposeofthistest v  istomitigatethecaseinordertopleaditdown.DefendantRonFoxandIhavedeterminedthat ,  thisisaninappropriatestrategy. G    ForensicPsychologicalTestingcanbeaformofselfincrimination.Sometimesphysical b testingjustifiedbythefleetingnatureofevidencebutnotinthiscase.Ronscaseisnota } situationoffleeingevidencelike SchmerbervCalifornia (1966)384U.S.757,16Led2nd  908.Ronssituationismorelike _Rochin_ԀvCalifornia (1952)342U.S.165,96LEd.183in  thatthetestingviolatesdueprocessoflawandisnotjustifiableevenconsideringcompeting 3 societalinterests.Ronisnttheguywhoactedwithmentaldefect;thecopsactedwithmental N! defectandmalice.RonswasXrX%&Vm involuntary #&Vm%XXr#Ԁtestingimposedbyapublicdefendertogiveitthe i# airofvoluntariness.IprotestedonRonsbehalf.4F݊O  5  %&Vmwww.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6201.html6Ontp  7oX 3#&Vm%=#Ԁ, % 4GݰO  5  %&Vmwww.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6203.html6O)ntp  7o~W#&Vm%a#Ԁ,%&VmԀ4HO  5  www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6202.html6GO[ntp  7o#&Vm%'#Ԁ, :' %&VmԀ4IO  5  www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6207.html6lOntp  7o#&Vm%L#Ԁ,4JHO  5  www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6204.html6\Opntp  7oZԀ,  U) 4KݰO  5  www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/6205.html6IO]ntp  7oԀ,4L^O  5  %&Vmwww.lawyerdude.8k.com/6317.html6O*ntp  7oX#&Vm%b#Ԁ, p+ 4MݰO  5  %&Vmwww.lawyerdude.8k.com/6318.html63OGntp  7ou#&Vm%#Ԁ,Motion6464,Motion6465,Motion6466,andothermotions. -   AlthoughIdonthavethetranscript,becausethecourtreporterrefusedtogivemea  / promptcopy,Idoknowfrommyinvestigationandconversationthatappointedcounsel, &!1 JenniferBarneswasattemptingtoimposeherownagendawithdirectlycontradictsRonsplan. A"3 Alawyermaynotdothat. \#5 AZ) xdE$xA w$ 7 @  AppendixATextofarticlebyMichiganProsecutorreFleeingandEluding. ol|Ԉ %-!9   FleeingandEludingvs.FleeingandEluding &H"; HaveyoueverwonderedifthereisadifferencebetweentheFleeingandEludingStatuteinthe 'c#= MotorVehicleCode(257.602a)andtheoneinthePenalCode(750.479a)?Whiletheyhave (~$? thesamewords,theydonothavethesameconsequences. )%A Accordingtothestatutes,FleeingandEludingintheMotorVehicleCodecannotbereducedto 4,'E attempted._MCL_Ԁ257.204b(2)states,withaddedemphasis,"thecourtshallimposeacriminal e penaltyforaconvictionofanattemptedviolationofthisact...inthesamemannerasifthe  offensehadbeencompleted." 6 IfadefendantpleastoAttemptedFleeingandEludingunder257.602a,thecourtmusttreatit l withthesamepenaltyastheoriginaloffense.Inotherwords,AttemptedFleeingandEluding    4thdegreeisstillatwo-yearfelony.However,FleeingandEludingunderthePenalCodedoes    nothavethatprovision.AttemptedFleeingandEluding4thdegreeunderthePenalCodeisa "  one-yearmisdemeanor.(Thelicensingsanctionsonadriver'slicensearenotaffectedbyeither =  provision.Theimpactonthedefendant'slicenseisthesameasifthedefendantwasconvicted X  oftheoriginalcharge._MCL_Ԁ257.204b(1).) s  @ JurisdictionalIssues )  Thisraisesanotherissue.ManytimesaFleeingandEluding4thDegreechargeisreducedto D  anattemptinDistrictCourt.However,undertheMotorVehicleCode,thepenaltyisstilltwo _ yearsandisoutsidethecourt'sjurisdictiontosentencethedefendant. z   @*  To"complicate"matters,whentheDistrictCourtsendstheabstractofconvictiontothe   SecretaryofState(SOS),onanAttempted4thDegreeFleeingandEluding,theSOSstill 0" considersitafelonyandkicksitback.ThishappenswitheitherprovisionbecausetheDistrict K$ Courthasnojurisdictiontohandleafelony,orbecauseofthecomputerprogram._MCL_ f& 257.204b(1)saysthatthelicensesanctionsshallbethesameastheoriginaloffensecharge. ( ThecomputerreadstheoriginalchargeasafelonycomingfromDistrictCourt,seesitasan 7* error,andkicksitback.Thismeansthelicenseactiondoesnottakeplace,eitherbecauseof R, thelaworacomputerprogramglitch.AccordingtotheSecretaryofState'soffice,togetaround m. thecomputer,theDistrictCourtsmustentertheabstractofconvictionmanually.Ifthatisnot 0 done,itisverylikelythatthedefendantisnotreceivingtheproperlicensesanctions.(The  2 computerissuedoesnothappenwiththeCircuitCourttakingthepleasinceithasjurisdiction #!4 ontheoriginalcharge.) >"6 Expungement t$ : OneareawherethesetwostatutesdonothaveadifferentimpactisundertheExpungement %*!< Statute(_MCL_Ԁ780.621).Accordingtothatstatute,expungementisnotallowedfor"traffic &E"> offenses."TrafficoffenseisspecificallydefinedasoffensesundertheMotorVehicleCode '`#@ (_MCL_Ԁ780.621a),thus,theFleeingandEludingStatuteintheMotorVehicleCodecannotbe ({$B expunged.SoitwouldappearthatitispossibletoexpungeaconvictionforFleeingandEluding )%D underthePenalCode.However,thisiswrong._MCL_Ԁ257.732(20)providesthat"Acourtshall +&F notorderexpunctionofanyviolationreportabletothesecretaryofstateunderthissection." 1,'H Pursuantto_MCL_Ԁ257.732(4)(a),afleeingandeludingconvictionunderthepenalcodemustbe e reportedtotheSecretaryofState.Thus,neitherchargecanbeexpunged.  _HYTA_ Q Finally,anotherareaofconcernisundertheHolmesYouthfulTraineeAct(_HYTA_),_MCL_ l 762.11.Accordingtothatsection,_HYTA_Ԁisnotallowedfor"atrafficoffense."Asusedinthat    section,"trafficoffense"meansaviolationoftheMichiganvehiclecode,ActNo.300ofthe    PublicActsof1949,beingsections257.1to257.923oftheMichiganCompiledLaws,ora "  violationofalocalordinancesubstantiallycorrespondingtothatact,whichinvolvesthe =  operationofavehicleand,atthetimeoftheviolation,isafelonyoramisdemeanor. X  Thus,apersonchargedforFleeingandEludingunderthePenalcodecouldget_HYTA_Ԁstatus, )  andapersonchargedundertheMotorVehicleCodecouldnot.However,thisquestionhasnot D  beendefinitelyanswered. _ ThebottomlineiswhenapersonisbeingchargedwithFleeingandEluding,beawareofthe  differencebetweenthetwostatutes.Whiletheyhavethesamewording,theyhavedifferent   consequences. 0"   ProsecutingAttorneysAssociationofMichigan f& 116WestOttawaStreet-Suite200,LansingMI48913 ( (517)334-6060-FAX:334-6351 7* 4ЌO  5  www.michiganprosecutor.org6Ooft  7or Ԁ R, AZ) xdEOxA m. _ XrX%&VmAppendix1:DetailedBriefregardingtheDoctrineentitled VoidforVagueness #&Vm%XXr#%&Vm 0 @G G #&Vm%#XrX%&Vm VoidforVagueness.FourteenthAmendmentAnnotations #&Vm%XXr#XrX%&VmԈ  2 @Thisarticleisat47 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vagueness.html6O  7Ԁ #!4 Firstannotation: >"6  Connallyvs.GeneralConstructionCo. (1926) Y#8 Ѐ4O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html6-OA  7doԀ269U.S.385 t$ : ` Thequestionwhethergivenlegislativeenactmentshavebeenthus %*!< wantingincertaintyhasfrequentlybeenbeforethiscourt.Insomeofthe &E"> casesthestatutesinvolvedwereupheld;inothers,declaredinvalid.The '`#@ precisepointofdifferentiationinsomeinstancesisnoteasyofstatement; ({$B butitwillbeenoughforpresentpurposestosaygenerallythatthe )%D decisionsofthecourt,upholdingstatutesassufficientlycertain,rested +&F upontheconclusionthattheyemployedwordsorphraseshavinga 1,'H technicalorotherspecialmeaning,wellenoughknowntoenablethose e withintheirreachtocorrectlyapplythemSupremeCourtin1926in   ConnallyvGen.Construction.  6 ` $  Thatthetermsofapenalstatutecreatinganewoffensemustbesufficiently Q explicittoinformthosewhoaresubjecttoitwhatconductontheirpartwillrenderthem l liabletoitspenaltiesisawell-recognizedrequirement,consonantalikewithordinary    notionsoffairplayandthesettledrulesoflaw;andastatutewhicheitherforbidsor    requiresthedoingofanactintermssovaguethatmenofcommonintelligencemust "  necessarilyguessatitsmeaninganddifferastoitsapplicationviolatesthefirst =  essentialof   dueprocess oflaw. X     InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct.853;   Collins s  v.Kentucky ,234U.S.634,638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,393] )  4efO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6xOtth  7ef,Ԁ... D  ` Thedividinglinebetweenwhatislawfulandunlawfulcannotbeleftto _ conjecture.Thecitizencannotbeheldtoanswerchargesbasedupon z penalstatuteswhosemandatesaresouncertainthattheywillreasonably  admitofdifferentconstructions.Acriminalstatutecannotrestuponan   uncertainfoundation.Thecrime,andtheelementsconstitutingit,mustbe 0" soclearlyexpressedthattheordinarypersoncanintelligentlychoose,in K$ advance,whatcourseitislawfulforhimtopursue.Penalstatutes f& prohibitingthedoingofcertainthings,andprovidingapunishmentfortheir ( violation,shouldnotadmitofsuchadoublemeaningthatthecitizenmay 7* actupontheoneconceptionofitsrequirementsandthecourtsupon R, another.' m. ` g    Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892) 0 Ѐ4 O  5  #&Vm%XXrr# %&Vmhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6$O$]   7$Ԁ#&Vm% %#XrX%&VmԀ143U.S.457;12S.Ct.511:  2 ` Ҁ"Alllawsshouldreceiveasensibleconstruction.Generaltermsshouldbe #!4 solimitedintheirapplicationasnottoleadtoinjustice,oppression,oran >"6 absurdconsequence.Itwillalwaysbepresumedthatthelegislature Y#8 intendedexceptionstoitslanguagewhichwouldavoidresultsofthis t$ : character.Thereasonofthelawinsuchcasesshouldprevailoverits %*!< letter." Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates 143U.S. &E"> 457;12S.Ct.511(1892) '`#@ ` 9&   Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68S.Ct.665: ({$B ` Ҁ"Menofcommonintelligencecannotberequiredtoguessatthemeaning )%D ofpenalenactment."Indeterminingwhetherpenalstatuteisinvalidfor +&F uncertainty,courtsmustdotheirbesttodeterminewhethervaguenessis 1,'H ofsuchacharacterthatmenofcommonintelligencemustguessatits e meaning."Whereastatuteissovagueastomakecriminalaninnocent  act,aconvictionunderitcannotbesustained." Wintersv.Peopleof 6 StateofNewYork ,333U.S.507;68S.Ct.665(1948) Q ` 6)   Giacciov.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86S.Ct.518: l Ҁ"Lawfailstomeetrequirementsof  dueprocessclauseifitissovagueand    standardlessthatitleavespublicuncertainastoconductitprohibitsorleaves    judgesandjurorsfreetodecide,withoutanylegallyfixedstandards,whatis "  prohibitedandwhatisnotineachparticularcase." Giacciov.Stateof =  Pennsylvania ,382U.S.399;86S.Ct.518(1966) X  B,   Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151(1917): s  ` "Intheinterpretationofstatuteslevyingtaxes,itisTHEESTABLISHED )  RULENOTTOEXTENDtheirprovisions,byimplication,BEYONDTHE D  CLEARIMPORTOFTHELANGUAGEUSED,ORTOENLARGEtheir _ operationsSOASTOEMBRACEMATTERSNOTSPECIFICALLY z POINTEDOUT"  ` .   Benzigerv.U.S. ,192U.S.38(1904):   Ҁ"Thisprovisionofthestatuteshouldbeliberallyconstruedinfavorofthe 0" importer,andiftherewereanyfairdoubtastothetrueconstructionofthe K$ provisioninquestion,thecourtsshouldresolvethedoubtinhisfavor.   American f& Net&TwineCo.v.Worthington ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup.Ct. ( Rep.55;  Ԁ UnitedStatesv.Wigglesworth ,2Story,369,Fed.Cas.No.16,690;   7*  Ricev.UnitedStates ,4C.C.A.104,10U.S.App.670,53Fed.910." R, s0   U.S.v.DeCadena ,105F.Supp.202,204(1952): m. Ҁ"Theessentialpurposeofthe"voidforvaguenessdoctrine"withrespectto 0 interpretationofacriminalstatute,istowarnindividualsofthecriminal  2 consequencesoftheirconduct....Criminalstatuteswhichfailtogiveduenotice #!4 thatanacthasbeenmadecriminalbeforeitisdoneareunconstitutional >"6 deprivationsofdueprocessoflaw." Y#8 3 Hassettv.Welch (1938)303US303,pp.314-315,82LEd858: t$ : ` Ҁ"....ifdoubtexistsastotheconstructionofataxingstatute,thedoubt %*!< shouldberesolvedinfavorofthetaxpayer..." &E"> ` 5   Sewellv.Georgia ,435U.S.982(1978): '`#@ ҀAswesaidin Graynedv.CityofRockford (1972)408U.S.104,108(1972): ({$B "Itisabasicprincipleof due  Ԁprocess thatanenactment[435U.S.982,986]is )%D voidforvaguenessifitsprohibitionsarenotclearlydefined.Vaguelawsoffend +&F severalimportantvalues.First,becauseweassumethatmanisfreetosteer 1,'H betweenlawfulandunlawfulconduct,weinsistthatlawsgivethepersonof e ordinaryintelligenceareasonableopportunitytoknowwhatisprohibited,sothat  hemayactaccordingly.Vaguelawsmaytraptheinnocentbynotprovidingfair 6 warning.Second,ifarbitraryanddiscriminatoryenforcementistobeprevented, Q lawsmustprovideexplicitstandardsforthosewhoapplythem.Avaguelaw l impermissiblydelegatesbasicpolicymatterstopolicemen,judges,andjuriesfor    resolutiononanadhocandsubjectivebasis,withtheattendantdangersof    arbitraryanddiscriminatoryapplication."Seealso Papachristou  Ԁv.Cityof "  Jacksonville ,405U.S.156(1972);   ԀClinev.FrinkDairyCo., 274U.S.445,47 =  S.Ct.681(1927); Connallyv.GeneralConstruction  ԀCo. ,269U.S.385(1926). X  6   ԀKarlanv.CityofCincinatti ,416U.S.924(1974): s  ` Ҁ"Thesecasesallinvolveconvictionsunderordinancesandstatuteswhich )  punishthemereutteranceofwordsvariouslydescribedas'abusive,' D  'vulgar,''insulting,''profane,''indecent,''boisterous,'andthelike.The _ provisionsarechallengedasbeingunconstitutionallyvagueand z overbroad.The'voidforvagueness'doctrineis,ofcourse,a  dueprocess   conceptimplementingprinciplesoffairwarningandnon-discriminatory   enforcement.Vaguelawsmaytrapthosewhodesiretobelaw-abidingby 0" notprovidingfairnoticeofwhatisprohibited. Papachristouv.Cityof K$ Jacksonville ,405U.S.156,162(1972);   UnitedStatesv.Harriss ,347 f& U.S.612,617(1954).Theyalsoprovideopportunityforarbitrary_and ( discriminatoryenforcementsincethose[416U.S.924,925]whoapply 7* thelawshavenoclearandexplicitstandardstoguidethem.   Coatesv. R, Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(1971);   _Shuttlesworth_Ԁv.Birmingham , m. 382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965) 0 4` O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6BOBtec  7taBԀ(Includesphotographof  2 ReverendFred_Shuttlesworth_).Further,whenavaguestatute"_abut[s_] #!4 uponsensitiveareasofFirstAmendmentfreedoms,'it'operatesto >"6 _inhibitthe_Ԁexerciseof[those]freedoms.'Uncertainmeaningsinevitably Y#8 leadcitizensto'steerfarwideroftheunlawfulzone...thanifthe t$ : boundariesoftheforbiddenareaswereclearlymarked." _Grayned_Ԁv. %*!< CityofRockford ,408U.S.104,109(1972),quoting_  _ Baggettv._Bullitt_ , &E"> 377U.S.360,372[1964loyaltyoathcase],and   _Speiser_Ԁv.Randall ,357 '`#@ U.S.513,526(1958)." ({$B ` 2=  Ԁ"Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'a )%D governmentalpurposetocontrolorpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjectto +&F stateregulationmaynotbeachievedbymeanswhichsweepunnecessarily 1,'H broadlyandtherebyinvadetheareaofprotectedfreedoms." _Zwickler_Ԁv. e _Koota_ ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting  }   NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,  307(1964). 6  ` Avaguestatutemaybeoverbroadifitsuncertainboundariesleaveopen Q thepossibilityofpunishmentforprotectedconductandthusleadcitizensto l avoidsuchprotectedactivityinordertosteerclearoftheuncertainproscriptions.     _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford supra,408U.S.at109;  Ԁ _Dombrowski_Ԁv._Pfister_ ,    380U.S.479,486(1965).Astatuteisalsooverbroad,however,if,eventhoughit "  isclearandprecise,itprohibitsconstitutionallyprotectedconduct.   _Aptheker_Ԁv. =  SecretaryofState ,378U.S.500,508-509(1964);  Ԁ _Shelton_Ԁv.Tucker ,364 X  U.S.479,488(1960)." s  G   CityofMesquitev._Alladin_'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283(1982): )  Ҁ" _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.104,108(emphasis[455U.S.283, D  290]added)*fn12...[Footnote12]TheCourtofAppealssummarizedthe _ relevantauthoritiesasfollows:"Alawisvoidforvaguenessifpersons`of z commonintelligencemustnecessarilyguessatitsmeaninganddifferastoits  application....' Smithv._Goguen_ ,415U.S.566,572n.8,quotingConnallyv.   GeneralConstructionCo.,269U.S.385,391.SeegenerallyNote,   The 0" Void-for-VaguenessDoctrineintheSupremeCourt ,109U.Pa.L.Rev.67 K$ (1960).Theoffenseto   due process liesinboththenatureandconsequencesof f& vagueness.First,vaguelawsdonotgiveindividualsfairnoticeoftheconduct ( proscribed. _Papachristou_Ԁv.CityofJacksonville ,405U.S.156,162.Accord 7*  _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.104,108&n.3.Second,vaguelawsdo R, notlimittheexerciseofdiscretionbylawenforcementofficials;thusthey m. engenderthepossibilityofarbitraryanddiscriminatoryenforcement.  P _Grayned_Ԁv. 0 CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.4  2 4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html6TOU   7 V3UԀ;  T _Papachristou_Ԁv.Cityof #!4 Jacksonville (1971)4R hO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html6DVOXV  7VԀ,405 >"6 U.S.at168-70.Third,vaguelawsdefeattheintrinsicpromiseof,andfrustrate Y#8 theessenceof,aconstitutionalregime.Weremain`agovernmentoflaws,and t$ : notofmen,'  x Marburyv.Madison (1803) %*!< Ѐ4cxO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6QXOeXlel  7siXԀ5U.S.(1Cranch.)137,163, &E"> onlysolongasourlawsremainclear."  630F.2d,at1037." '`#@ N@*#&Vm%XXr%#ԈAZ) xdE,xA 1,'H @  AppendixCLinktoStoryaboutEd_Czuprynski_,oneofmyotherdonothinglocal e lawyers:  nZ   4# O  5  http://www.injusticeline.com/Czu.html64[OH[e  7v[Ԁ 6 AZ) xdE3xA Q @++" ProofofService  l   I,DouglasPalaschak,declarethefollowingunderpenaltyofperjury:Iattemptedto    obtainthefaxnumberforthecourtat8:10a.m.on"6US,  , US,  , 6Tuesday,October10,2006.Michelleat    989-895-4265saidthattheydontacceptanyfaxes.ThereafterIfoundafaxnumberforthe "  courtinmyfiles.Ifaxedversion1.000ofthismotionat8:30a.m.toJudgeCaprathescourtat =  9898954099.IemailedalinktothistoAttorneyPaulBeggsat X  4@ O  5  beggsandschisler@sbcglobal.net6_O_  7 >J_Ԁat8:24a.m.havingpreadvisedthemyesterdayOctober9th s  thatIwoulddoso.At8:25a.m.IcalledtheBeggsofficeat 9898933221 andtalkedtoBruce )  Manico(phonetic).Hesaidthatthesecretarieswouldbetherein5minutesmaybe.Ileftmy D  number.IexplainedthatIfaxedalinktothemthatwouldlinktoRonFoxsmotionfortoday. _ Brucesaidhewouldleaveamessagebuthedidnothaveaccesstotheemail.Thereafterat z 8:35IcalledbackandtalkedtoDonnaattheofficeofPaulBeggs.Sherememberedme  talkingtoheryesterday.Shesaidshewouldchecktheemailanddownloadthemotionand    seewhat[she]coulddo.Sheisonly5minutesfromthecourthouse.Isuggestedthatshe 0" findawaytogetthatmotiontocourt. K$   Thereafterat8:57a.m.Icalledthecourtat8954265TheytransferredmetoJudge f& Caprathescourt.IaskedtheclerktoaskAttorneyPaulBeggstocallhisoffice.Shesaidhe ( wasjustthere.ItoldherthatIfaxedamotiontothecourtandthattheRonFoxtrialwouldbe 7* prematureandthatIemailedamotiontotheofficeofAttorneyBeggsandthatcellphonesare R, usuallyoffincourt.ShesaidthatshewouldrelaythemessagetoAttorneyBeggsifshesaw m. him. 0   Thereafterat9:07a.m.IcalledtheofficeofAttorneyPaulBeggsat8933221.Iwasput  2 onhold.ItalkedtoDonna.Yes,shehasindeedprintedoutthemotionthatIsenther. #!4 However,sherefusedtoevenwritedownthenumberforthecourt.Althoughthecourtisonly5 >"6 minutesawaythereisnobodytodrivethere.ShesaysthatPaulBeggsmaycallherandthen Y#8 shewilltellhimaboutthemotion. t$ :   Thereafterat9:15ItalkedtoDeputyWalzacatthejailat9898954066.Iexplainedthe %*!< situationtoher.ShesaidthatRonwasstillthereandhadnotgonetocourt.Ofcoursesheis &E"> notpermittedtogiveanymessagetoRon.Shesaidthatthebestthingtodowouldbetocall '`#@ thecourtwhichiswhatIhadpreviouslydone. ({$B   ThereafterIcalledArtSchupbackandhesaidthathelivesontheothersideoftownand )%D itistoofartodrive. +&F   Thereafterat9:40a.m.(6:40a.m.Pacifictime)Idropped4copiesintothepostaldrop 1,'H boxandsendingthemtoRoninjailbyprioritymail. e Signed________________DouglasPalaschak%  .Tuesday,October10,2006