WPCH ԩș2&g=J@bȰbJ܃_ΛYDvĸ9(D3Wh^ G!1aG/g  L>8I'9Kbc h{ wXwå "ұ>MOwP7x1!vN5d +*  %>O&v&' '''`'{' )`6** +:,@,F,L,bR,l, 0-`r.&. 0`1b1`2 4b555 B6 D5"6W6]6 D5c6666666`6 B*7 D5F7 B{7 B7 D57 B7 D58 B<8 D1Y8 D58 D58 B*8 D59 B*S9 D5}9 B*9 D59 B7: B7H:: ^<`=d=j=*p= ?@@F@`L@m@C C`C)D/D5D;D`AD!D`E"F 5H HI`II;I (KKZK=M N 3NN O2VP Q .RRRR  R  R  R  S  S  S  S(S &TTT'U V  wW  W  W  W  W  W W  =X  GX  QX  [X heXX Y hZJZ 9\ \ ]^ y_N`i` 3cNcD'd ke%f *g  g  g  g  g  g  g  g  h  h  h  &h  0h  :h  Dh  Nh  Xh  bh  lhvh qkl l_m no p$Mq qr s #t  t  t  t  t  t  t  u  u  u  #u  -u  7u  Au  Ku )Uu ~u v  w  "w,w Rw  ;x  Ex  Ox  Yx  cxVmx z z>g{v{ A|\| TX}N}N}  H~@R~:~X~~$@Xhp LaserJet 10120(9 Z6Times New Roman RegularX(f$ XX  USUS.,    -kAZArial    Q,XXUSUS.,   d   d ((#(#(  Ad )1dE'01AAX )1qdE#1A1  2 8 3  4 H  5   6 X   7  0  8 h  9 @  10 x  11 P 12  13 ` 14  15  p 16  17 0  18 " 19 @ $ 20 !& 21 P#( 22 $( * 23 `&!, 24 '8#. 25 p)$0 26 *H&2 27 ,'4 28(3Q$ f!XXUSUS.,       d kR5 2;5:i+003|x Uhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/weeks.html(O$http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5635.htmlpage page chapter volume footnote endnote (Vm$0   (,!$0  0` (#(#  (@$0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# ` ( $http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/weeks.htmlu.s. supreme court cases 889Calif statutes     9http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.htmlhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdfhttp://www.lawyer.gq.nu/vagueness.html0*http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vagueness.html9th circuit 09u8  f!XXPUSUS.,  _&] %P U.S.vEricColin #P %&]#(9thcircuit2002)4; vO  5  http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.html6'O;  7 iԀisbindingprecedentinthiscase.The  term asnearlyaspracticableisimpermissiblyandunconstitutionallyvague.Ihavesearchedthecase  file.ThereisnodescriptionofwhatIdidthatviolatesthelaw.Merelytouchingthelanedividerlineis F insufficientjustificationtojustifyatrafficstop.Thatisthesubjectofaconcurrentmotiontosuppress T evidence.ThisColincaseisbindingprecedentintheinstantcase.Thiscourthasnodiscretion.They  mustdismissmycase.4< l O  5  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdf6AOU  7 4ԀAstowhatwouldmake  alanechangeunsafe,thisdefectivestatutefailstowarnme.9 leading case pertaining to vagueness of the words a9th circuit 09u8http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.htmlhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdf2$(http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html  f!XXUSUS.,  _ ConnallyvGeneralConstruction (1926)269U.S.3854D O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html6O  7 6Ԁ#@#BConnally v General Construction (1926) 269 U.S. 385u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html f!XXUSUS.,  _ InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct.853E. International Harvester Co. v. Kentucky, 234 U.u.s. supreme court cases 889%/Page of &  MU)XXUSUS.,    _j j (#C_Christensin_sSuppressionMotionbasedonVaguenessandOverbreadth.(3U$ f!XXUSUS.,      http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html  f!XXUSUS.,  _ _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.44Q O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html6O  7 GԀ#Q#OGrayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. at 108-09 & nu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html  f!XXUSUS.,  _ _Papachristou_Ԁv.CityofJacksonville (1971)4U O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html6 O   7t ^Ԁ405U.S.  156.Vaguelawsdefeattheintrinsicpromiseof,andfrustratetheessenceof,aconstitutionalregime.SPapachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1971) http://u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html5 dgggg)!dxdx&XXXX)!dxdx7.-#6http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html&0 d dffff)!dxdx  dP Pdiiii)!dxdx dkkkk)!dxdx dgg)! dxdxdddd)!dxdxoooo)!dxdx&P d dqqqq)!dxdx&p d Pdssss)!dxdx&p Pd duvuv)!dxdx3+0 d d d3+0 d d d  f!XXUSUS.,  _ _Marbury_Ԁv.Madison (1803)4y( O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6Olel  7si+Ԁ5U.S.(1Cranch.)137wMarbury v. Madison (1803) http://www.lawyerdude.neu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html"1  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).Avaguestatutemaybe_overbroad_Ԁifitsuncertain  boundariesleaveopenthepossibilityofpunishmentforprotectedconductandthusleadcitizenstoavoid r suchprotectedactivityinordertosteerclearoftheuncertainproscriptions.|NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U.S. 288, 307 (1964). A vagueu.s. supreme court cases 889)+http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html c f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892)4 O  5  Phttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6O  7 "?Ԁ  #PI#143U.S.457;12_S.Ct_.511'Rector, Etc., Of Holy Trinity Church v. United Statesu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html, http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68_S.Ct_.665.http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html  f!XXUSUS.,  _ Collinsv.Kentucky (1914)Tobaccocase.4 RO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6O  7 +Ԁ234U.S.  634,638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,393]Collins v. Kentucky, 234 U.S. 634, 638 , 34 S. Ct. u.s. supreme court cases 889Winters v. People of State of New York (1948) 333 Uu.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html8 1 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Giaccio_Ԁv.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86_S.Ct_.518.Giaccio v. State of Pennsylvania (1966) 382 U.S. 39u.s. supreme court cases 889    P f!XXPUSUS.,  __ United_ԀStatesv._Wigglesworth_ ,2Story,369,Fed._Cas_.No.16,690. f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151(1917)Gould v. Gould, 245 US., 151 (1917)u.s. supreme court cases 889fed dist court cases f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Benziger_Ԁv.U.S. ,192U.S.38(1904).Benziger v. U.S., 192 U.S. 38 (1904)u.s. supreme court cases 889 ( f!XXPUSUS.,  _ AmericanNet&TwineCo.v._Worthington_ ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup.Ct.Rep.55American Net & Twine Co. v. Worthington, 141 U.S. 4u.s. supreme court cases 889 United States v. Wigglesworth, 2 Story, 369, Fedu.s. supreme court cases 889!3        f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Ricev.UnitedStates ,4C.C.A.104,10U.S.App.670,53Fed.910. Rice v. United States, 4 C. C. A. 104, 10 U. S. 9th circuit 09u8    f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Sewell_Ԁv.Georgia ,435U.S.982(1978)  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ U.S.v.De_Cadena_ ,105_F.Supp_.202,204(1952).U.S. v. De Cadena, 105 F.Supp. 202, 204 (1952)fed dist court cases       Sewell v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 982 (1978u.s. supreme court cases 889    Papachristou v. City of Jacksonville (1971) http://  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Clinev._Frink_ԀDairyCo., 274U.S.445,47S.Ct.681(1927) Cline v. Frink Dairy Co., 274 U.S. 445, 47 S. Ct. u.s. supreme court cases 889Connally v General Construction (1926) 269 U.S. 385 @ f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Karlan_Ԁ_v._ԀCityof_Cincinatti_ ,416U.S.924(1974). Karlan v. City of Cincinatti, 416 U.S. 924 (1974):u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ UnitedStatesv._Harriss_ ,347U.S.612,617(1954).United States v. Harriss, 347 U.S. 612, 617 ( 1954)u.s. supreme court cases 889 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ Coatesv.Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(1971).Coates v. Cincinnati, 402 U.S. 611, 614 ( 1971); u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Shuttlesworth_Ԁv.Birmingham ,382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965)  4O  5  Phttp://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6>ORtec  7tadԀ#P՚#(IncludesphotographofReverendFred_Shuttlesworth_)Shuttlesworth v. Birmingham, 382 U.S. 87 , 90-91, 1u.s. supreme court cases 889http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html : f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Baggett_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Bullitt_ ,377U.S.360,372(1964) Baggett v. Bullitt, 377 U.S. 360, 372 (1964)u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Speiser_Ԁv.Randall ,357U.S.513,526_(1958)._Speiser v. Randall, 357 U.S. 513, 526 (1958)u.s. supreme court cases 889                ! " #  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Zwickler_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Koota_ ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).  "Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'agovernmentalpurposeto r controlorpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjecttostateregulationmaynotbeachievedbymeans 0 whichsweepunnecessarilybroadlyandtherebyinvadetheareaofprotectedfreedoms.Zwick "Overbreadth, on the other hand, 'offends the cu.s. supreme court cases 889 f!XXPUSUS.,  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).NAACP v. Alabama, 377 U.S. 288, 307 (1964)u.s. supreme court cases 889 U f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Dombrowski_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Pfister_ ,380U.S.479,486(1965)   p  Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479, 486 (1965)u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Aptheker_Ԁv.SecretaryofState ,378U.S.500,508-509(1964).Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. 500 , 508-u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXPUSUS.,  _ _Shelton_Ԁ_v._ԀTucker ,364U.S.479,488(1960). Shelton v. Tucker, 364 U.S. 479, 488 (1960).u.s. supreme court cases 889  f!XXUSUS.,  _ CityofMesquitev._Alladin_'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283(1982).City of Mesquite v. Alladin's Castle, Inc., 455 U.Su.s. supreme court cases 889 $ % & ' ( ) * + , - . / 0 1schol treatises  f!XXUSUS.,  _ TheVoid-for-VaguenessDoctrineintheSupremeCourt ,109U.Pa.L.Rev.67(1960).The Void-for-Vagueness Doctrine in the Supreme Courtschol treatises 2 3 f!XXUSUS.,  _630F.2d,at1037630 F.2d, at 1037fed dist court cases 4 5 6 7 8 L f!XXUSUS.,  _XaX PublicLicensesandPrivateRights (1953)Excerptsfrom33OregonLawReview1  (Barnett,1953)publishedat:4  O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html6`Ot  7 Ԁ__due processPublic Licenses and Private Rights (1953) Excerpts schol treatiseshttp://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.htmlhttp://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdfclauses of fed constitution f!XXPUSUS.,  _DueProcessClauseofthe14th_Amendement._ due processclauses of fed constitutionhttp://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.htmlhttp://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html 9http://www.fu.gq.nu/vague2.htmlmailto:chris010767@yahoo.comhttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7901.pdfhttp://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/joliet/prisons/statevilMap.htmlhttp://www.willcountycourts.com4http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7901.wpd f!XXUSUS.,      _K8dd8LPrChristopherChristensenProSe  4644West98thStreet,OakLawn,Illinois60453 t Phone#7086986546 8 4 O  5  chris010767@yahoo.com6O-wro  7t [ L Thisdocumentis4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7901.pdf6O  7 >Ԁ  \    `  and4 ( O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/7901.wpd6 O  7 MԀ__      ` XaXIntheCircuitCourtof12thJudicialDistrictforWillCounty,Illinois ,|   @ 򀄀homeof_Stateville_ԀPrisons #XXa2#Ԉ @  @ 4 O  5  http://_www.suburbanchicagonews.com_/_joliet_/prisons/_statevilMap.html_Ԁ6WOk  7 Ԁ      `    14WestJefferson,Joliet,Illinois60432 x  @!Phone#8157278400 < @Website:4tO  5  www.willcountycourts.com6{OCOO  7tԈ P @ XaX CourtofJudgeRichard_Schoienstdedt_Ԁ #XXa` #Ԉ  ((#(#(5eL5Prosecutor_dba_Ԁthelegalfictionof thePeopleof  Illinois Q v e XaX ChristopherChristensen #XXa #,oneoftheactual ) peopleofIllinois.  Casenumber: Q Document#7901Version1.0000  )(#(# FirstSubstantiveMotionforDefendant.  XaX 0  d MotiontoSuppressEvidencebasedon a  VaguenessandOverbreadth.%u!(#(# #XXaX # Date:0  Thursday,September28.#(#(# Time:0  1:30pmq$(#(# Place:0  CourtofJudgeRichard_Schoienstdedt_Ԁ 5%(#(# @Jz  ?  AA, @5(#(#t 5@8 8  NoticeofMotionandPartialWaiveroftime.  N%   Atthevenuedesignatedinthecaptionoratsuchothervenueasthecourtshallotherwisedesignate,  & Iwilldemandthattheevidenceinthiscasebestricken.Theevidenceisthefruitoftheforbiddentree.Itwas !8( obtainedinviolationofmyconstitutionalrights.In1914theU.S.SupremeCourtreenunciatedthis #^* exclusionaryruleinthecaseof Weeks ,foundat:4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/weeks.html6O  7 Ԁ 4$, @6 6  %   WaiverofSpeedyTrialRightstoHearthisMotion.    Z% .   Iwaivemyspeedytrialrightsasnecessarytodothismotionandmyothermotions. &!0 Signed__________________ChristopherChristensen.Thursday,August24,2006 '"2 XaX TableofContents: #XXa# ($4    Vm  Vm0     WaiverofSpeedyTrialRightstoHearthisMotion.#NN>(#.<(#(##4 O  5  Page1of116XOl  7 Vm݌ T*%6 Ќ  Vm  VmD0     Statementofthecase #NN>(#.f f (#(##4 O  5  Page2of116O  7 VmD`݌ +,'8 Ќ  __!  !0  0` (#(#    TheAccusatoryStatutesinthiscase:#NN>(#.4` (#` (##4 O  5  Page2of116O  7 !݌  Ќ  Vm  Vmy0     ArgumentandMemorandumofLawSupportingSuppression.#NN>(#.RR@(#(##4 O  5  Page2of116$O8  7 fVmy݌ 8 Ќ  Vm  Vm0     Thestatuteisfatally_overbroad_Ԁandfatallyvague. #NN>(#.=(#(##4  O  5  Page2of116O  7  Vm,݌  Ќ  Vm  Vm0     TableofAuthoritiescitedherein: #NN>(#.,(#(##4! NO  5  Page2of116gO{  7 (#Vm݌ H  Ќ  !  !S0  0` (#(#    U.S.ConstitutionalClausescitedherein: #NN>(#.8` (#` (##4" NO  5  Page2of116 O  7 (#L!Sn݌  \ Ќ  !  !0  0` (#(#    U.S.SupremeCourtCasescitedherein: #NN>(#.HH5` (#` (##4# NO  5  Page2of116O  7 (#!݌   Ќ  !  ! 0  0` (#(#    FederalCircuitCasescitedherein: #NN>(#.2` (#` (##4$NO  5  Page4of116G!O[!  7(#!! ݌    Ќ  !  !3"0  0` (#(#    FederalDistrictCourtcasescitedherein: #NN>(#.9` (#` (##4%NO  5  Page4of116"O"  7(#-#!3"N"݌ X   Ќ  !  !#0  0` (#(#    IllinoisStatutescitedherein: #NN>(#..` (#` (##4&NO  5  Page4of116$O$  7(#$!##݌  l  Ќ  !  !p%0  0` (#(#    ScholarlyTreatisescitedherein: #NN>(#.0` (#` (##4'NO  5  Page4of116&O3&  7(#a&!p%%݌  0  Ќ  !  ! '0  0` (#(#    Argument #NN>(#.  ` (#` (##4(NO  5  Page4of116'O'  7(#'! '&'݌   Ќ    (0  0` (#(#0 ` (#` (# `   PreliminaryArgumentinSupportofMotiontoSuppressEvidencebasedonOverbreadthand h  Vagueness#NN>(#." (# (##4)NO  5  Page4of116)O)  7(#)((݌ ,|  Ќ  Vm  Vm*0     DeclarationofAttorneyDouglasPalaschakregardingneedforthefileandtranscripts.#NN>(#.,,`(#(##4*NO  5  Page6of116U+Oi+  7(#+Vm**݌   Ќ  Vm  VmA,0     Appendix1:DetailedBriefregardingtheDoctrineentitled VoidforVagueness #NN>(#.rrZ(#(##4+NO  5  Page7of116-O&-  7(#T-VmA,],݌ < Ќ  Vm  Vm-0     ProofofService #=(#. (#(##4,O  5  Page10of116.O.  7(#.Vm-.݌  Ќ  AX ) xdExA L @ %   XaX Statementofthecase #XXa 0#  /Ԉ `   ThiscasearisesfromatrafficstopintheearlymorninghoursofTuesday4April,2006. $   IandmyassociateHelenRogerswereworking.Istoppedatanintersection.Thefrontofmycar J enteredtheintersection.Apolicecarhadtherightofwayanddrovethroughtheintersectionandcaughtup  p withmeatanotherintersection.Therehegavemeaticketforfailuretoyieldatanintersection.HoweverI F didyieldattheintersection. l!   Meanwhilethepartnertookmyassociateasideandtoldherahalfdozentimesthatifdrugswereto # befoundinthecarsheshouldsaythatthedrugsweremine. %  @**%   TheAccusatoryStatutesinthiscase:  3  .'   WithoutacopyofthecomplaintIstatethattheaccusatorystatutesare Drivingwhilelicenserevoked !T) and Failuretoyieldintersection. Prosecutionunderthisstatuteisprohibitedbythe%     due  Ԁprocess *"z+ clauseofthe14thamendment . P#- @zz %   XaXArgumentandMemorandumofLawSupportingSuppression.#XXa5#  5  v$/ @ %   XaX Thestatuteisfatallyoverbroadandfatallyvague. #XXa6#  6Ԉ % 1 %   XaX TableofAuthoritiescitedherein: #XXa]7#  P7 &"3 %   XaX U.S.ConstitutionalClausescitedherein: #XXa8#  8 '"4        8  DueProcessClauseofthe14th_Amendement_.$$(#.44-$O  5  Page2of116t9O9  79,4.ZO  5  Page5of116(:O<:  74j:,4/O  5  Page7of116:O:  7j ;-4 O  5  10of116;O;  7(#; 88݈ J(#5 Ќ̌  8AX ) xdEU*xA )"%7 %   XaX U.S.SupremeCourtCasescitedherein: #XXa<#  < *%8        =   AmericanNet&TwineCo.v._Worthington_ ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup.Ct.Rep.55 Z+&9 NN>(#. 43NO  5  Page8of116>O>  7(#>==݈ ,n': Ќ      ?   _Aptheker_Ԁv.SecretaryofState ,378U.S.500,508-509(1964).=(#.00H44O  5  Page10of116E@OY@Stat  7o(#@ ??݈  Ќ̌  _    CA  _ _Baggett_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Bullitt_ ,377U.S.360,372_(1964)=(#.zz645oO  5  Page10of116OBOcBStat  7o(#B CA^A݈ 8 Ќ̌      =C  _ _Benziger_Ԁv.U.S. ,192U.S.38_(1904).NN>(#./46oNO  5  Page8of116DODStat  7o(#DD =CXC݈  Ќ̌      D  _ CityofMesquitev._Alladin_'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283_(1982).=(#.88J4=oO  5  Page10of116EOEStat  7o(#F D E݈ H  Ќ̌      F  _ Clinev._Frink_ԀDairyCo., 274U.S.445,47S.Ct.681_(1927)NN>(#.F4>oNO  5  Page9of116GOGStat  7o(#G FF݈   Ќ̌      H  _ Coatesv.Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(_1971).NN>(#.:4?oNO  5  Page9of1166IOJIStat  7o(#xI HH݈ X   Ќ̌      #J  _ Collinsv.Kentucky (1914)Tobaccocase.4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6JOJ  7 (JԀ234U.S.634,  0  638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,_393]NN>(#.14@oNO  5  Page7of116KOKStat  7o(#(L #J>J݈   Ќ̌      L  _ ConnallyvGeneralConstruction (1926)269U.S.3854D O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html6\MOpM  7 MԀ_#M# ,|  /(#. 4GoO  5  Page5of116NONStat  7oN,4HoNO  5  Page9of116bOOvOStat  7o(#O LL݈ @  Ќ̌      OP  _ _Dombrowski_Ԁ_v._Ԁ_Pfister_ ,380U.S.479,486(1965)   p =(#.pp24IoO  5  Page10of116fQOzQStat  7o(#Q_ OPjP݈ x  Ќ̌      dR  _ _Giaccio_Ԁv.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86_S.Ct_._518.NN>(#.M4JoNO  5  Page8of116gSO{SStat  7o(#S dRR݈ P Ќ̌      TT  _ Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151_(1917)NN>(#.-4VoNO  5  Page8of116TO UStat  7o(#9U TToT݈  Ќ̌      U  _ _Grayned_Ԁv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.44Q O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html6VOV  7 VԀ_#V# ` =(#. 4WoO  5  Page10of116WOWStat  7o(#$X UU݈ $ Ќ̌      X  _ InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct._853NN>(#.T4ZoNO  5  Page7of116YOYStat  7o(#Y XX݈ \ Ќ̌      Z  _ _Karlan_Ԁ_v._ԀCityof_Cincinatti_ ,416U.S.924_(1974).NN>(#.""<4[oNO  5  Page9of116[O[Stat  7o(#[ ZZ݈ 4 Ќ̌      \  _ _Marbury_Ԁv.Madison (1803)4y( O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6]O*]lel  7siU]Ԁ5U.S.(1Cranch.)_137 l =(#. 4]oO  5  Page10of116=^OQ^Stat  7o(#^ \\݈ 0  Ќ̌      +_  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307_(1964).=(#.ff54^oO  5  Page10of116_O_  7_(#` +_F_݈ " Ќ̌      `  _ NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).Avaguestatutemaybe_overbroad_Ԁifitsuncertainboundaries @ $ leaveopenthepossibilityofpunishmentforprotectedconductandthusleadcitizenstoavoidsuchprotected !T% activityinordertosteerclearoftheuncertainproscriptions.=(#.K4__O  5  Page10of116bOb  7_(#b_ ``݈ !& Ќ̌      c  _ _Papachristou_Ԁv.CityofJacksonville (1971)4U O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html63dOGd  7t dԀ405U.S. P#( 156.Vaguelawsdefeattheintrinsicpromiseof,andfrustratetheessenceof,aconstitutional_regime. $d) .(#. 4`_O  5  Page9of116eOe  7_+f,4a_O  5  Page10of116fOf  7_(#f cc݈ $( * Ќ̌      g  _ Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892)4 :O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6hO1h  7 !\hԀ#fh#143 `&!, U.S.457;12_S.Ct_._511NN>(#.( ( 4b_NO  5  Page8of116iOi  7_(#i gg݈ $'t"- Ќ̌      j  _ _Sewell_Ԁv.Georgia ,435U.S.982_(1978)NN>(#.>>04z_NO  5  Page9of116[kOok  7_(#k jj݈ (#/ Ќ̌      Hl  _ _Shelton_Ԁ_v._ԀTucker ,364U.S.479,488_(1960).=(#.64{_O  5  Page10of1164mOHm  7_(#vm Hlcl݈ 4*%1 Ќ̌      "n  _ _Shuttlesworth_Ԁv.Birmingham ,382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965) + '3 4O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6nO otec  7tadDoԀ#No#(IncludesphotographofReverendFred_Shuttlesworth)NN>(#.**e4~_NO  5  Page9of116|pOp  7_(#p"n=n݈ ,'4 Ќ      iq  _ _Speiser_Ԁv.Randall ,357U.S.513,526_(1958)._=(#.74_O  5  Page10of116FrOZr  7_(#r_ iqq݈  Ќ̌  _    Ts   UnitedStatesv._Harriss_ ,347U.S.612,617(1954).NN>(#.>4_NO  5  Page9of116tOt  7_(#Jt Tsos݈ 8 Ќ̌      t   UnitedStatesv._Wigglesworth_ ,2Story,369,Fed._Cas_.No.16,690.NN>(#.L4_NO  5  Page8of116uOu  7_(#v tu݈  Ќ̌      v   Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68_S.Ct_.665.NN>(#.S4_NO  5  Page8of116wOw  7_(#w vv݈ H  Ќ̌      zx   _Zwickler_Ԁv._Koota_ ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307(1964).   "Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'agovernmentalpurposetocontrol    orpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjecttostateregulationmaynotbeachievedbymeanswhichsweep X   unnecessarilybroadlyandtherebyinvadetheareaofprotectedfreedoms.=(#.  S4_O  5  Page10of116zOz  7_(#-{ zxx݈  l  Ќ̌  =AX ) xdE'xA     %   XaX FederalCircuitCasescitedherein: #XXae|#  X| h  8       }   Ricev.UnitedStates ,4C.C.A.104,10U.S.App.670,53Fed.910.NN>(#.P4_NO  5  Page8of116}O}  7_(#} }/}݈ ,|  Ќ̌      ~  &B % U.S.vEricColin # %&B~#(9thcircuit2002)4; O  5  http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.html6SOg  7 Ԁisbindingprecedentinthiscase.The   term asnearlyaspracticableisimpermissiblyandunconstitutionallyvague.Ihavesearchedthecasefile. x  ThereisnodescriptionofwhatIdidthatviolatesthelaw.Merelytouchingthelanedividerlineisinsufficient < justificationtojustifyatrafficstop.Thatisthesubjectofaconcurrentmotiontosuppressevidence.ThisColin P caseisbindingprecedentintheinstantcase.Thiscourthasnodiscretion.Theymustdismissmycase.  4< O  5  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdf6gO{  7 xԀAstowhatwouldmakealanechangeunsafe,this  defectivestatutefailstowarnme.NN>(#.PP-4ONO  5  Page5of116ăO؃  7O(# ~~݈ L Ќ̌  }AX ) xdEWxA $ %   XaX FederalDistrictCourtcasescitedherein: #XXa1# Pr$  Pr        630F.2d,at1037=(#. 4OO  5  Page10of116LO`  7O(# ݈ \ Ќ̌      :   U.S.v.De_Cadena_ ,105_F.Supp_.202,204(1952).NN>(#.94ONO  5  Page8of116 O  7O(#K :U݈ 4 Ќ̌  ۅAX ) xdExA l %   XaX IllinoisStatutescitedherein: #XXav#  i 0     AX ) xdEwxA D! %   XaX ScholarlyTreatisescitedherein: #XXa#  "       N  XaX PublicLicensesandPrivateRights (1953)Excerptsfrom33OregonLawReview1 |# (Barnett,1953)publishedat:4  O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html63OG  7 rԀXXaNN>(#.LLO4ONO  5  Page7of1163OG  7O(#u Ni݈ @ $ Ќ̌         TheVoid-for-VaguenessDoctrineintheSupremeCourt ,109U.Pa.L.Rev.67(1960). !& =(#. 4OO  5  Page10of116O  7O(#, ;݈ "' Ќ̌  BAX ) xdE$xA $d) @&%   XaX Argument@@* #XXa|# :/oԈ $( *   %   PreliminaryArgumentinSupportofMotiontoSuppressEvidencebasedonOverbreadthand %N!, Vagueness #  $'t".   Theprosecutionbearstheburdenofproofinasuppressionmotion.Themotionisfoundedonthe J(#0 1914 Weeks case:4 V O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/weeks.html6oO  7 *ԀIwillbesupplementingthisargument p)$2 afterIreceivediscoveryinthiscaseAlthoughnocomplainthasbeendeliveredtome,thepredicateoffense *%4 givingrisetothetrafficstopwastheallegedfailuretoyield. + '6 P       Thisstatuteisunconstitutionally_overbroad_Ԁandvagueandcannotforthebasisofacriminal  complaint.FurthermorethecomplaintdoesnotsaywhatIdidtoviolatethatsection.Furthermorethereis & nocomplaint. L    &B %U.S.vEricColin # %&B#(9thcircuit2002)4 QO  5  http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.html6XOl  7 Ԁisillustrative.Theterm asnearly "r aspracticableisimpermissiblyandunconstitutionallyvague.Ihavenotseenthefiles.Thereisno H  descriptionofwhatIdidthatviolatesthelaw.Merelytouchingthelanedividerlineisinsufficientjustification n   tojustifyatrafficstopandsomebaldallegationthatIfailedtoyieldisalsoinsufficient.Youmustdismissmy    case.4 WO  5  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdf6O  7 4ԀAstowheretodrawthelinebetweenyielding   andnotyielding,thisdefectivestatutefailstowarnme.  0    Thisstatutedeniesthedriverhisconstitutionalrightto due%    Ԁprocess byfailingtoadequatelyinstruct V  himastowhatconstitutesviolationofthelaw.Avaguestatuteviolatesthe dueprocessclause ofthe14th ,|  amendment.Thisconceptisknownas voidforvagueness .Vaguenessisasubjectofbothconstitutional R  lawandcriminallaw.Itistaughtineverylawschoolinthiscountryandhasbeenforthepast50years.Some x  leadingcaseregardingvaguenessare _Grayned_ԀvRockford and %   C ConnallyvGeneralConstruction (1926)  269U.S.385  Ѐ4A O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html6O  7 TϝԀVaguenessisdiscussedatthefollowingtwoarticles: : Ѐ42 O  5  http://www.lawyer.gq.nu/vagueness.html6OĞ  7 jԀ(ReprintedintheAppendixtothisbrief)and `  4PaO  5  http://www.fu.gq.nu/vague2.html6Oҟse.  7y Ԁ 6" InConnallyastatutetherewasheldtobefatallyvague.TheSupremeCourtsaid: \$ Thequestionwhethergivenlegislativeenactmentshavebeenthuswantingincertaintyhas & frequentlybeenbeforethiscourt.Insomeofthecasesthestatutesinvolvedwereupheld;in ( others,declaredinvalid.Theprecisepointofdifferentiationinsomeinstancesisnoteasyof * statement;butitwillbeenoughforpresentpurposestosaygenerallythatthedecisionsof D, thecourt,upholdingstatutesassufficientlycertain,restedupontheconclusionthatthey j. employedwordsorphraseshavingatechnicalorotherspecialmeaning,wellenoughknown @ 0 toenablethosewithintheirreachtocorrectlyapplythem.U.S.SupremeCourt. f!2    Asforamorefocusedcaseregardingtheverywordsusedinthisstatute,a%   : Ԁleadingcasepertaining "4 tovaguenessofthewords asnearlyaspracticableisthecaseof&B % U.S.vEricColin # %&B/#(9thcircuit2002) #6 40 O  5  http://www.fu.gq.nu/colin.html6Oʥ  7 " Ԁ $( 8   Ihavesearchedthecasefile.ThereisnodescriptionofwhatIdidthatviolatesthelaw.Merely %N!: touchingthelanedividerlineisinsufficientjustificationtojustifyatrafficstop.Thatisthesubjectofa $'t"< concurrentmotiontosuppressevidence. J(#>   ThisColincaseisbindingprecedentintheinstantcase.Thiscourthasnodiscretion.Youmust p)$@ dismissmycase. *%B Ѐ41 O  5  http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/data2/circs/9th/0150140p.pdf6~O  7 Ԁ + 'D AX ) xdE3xA  @ %   DeclarationofAttorneyDouglasPalaschakregardingneedforthefileandtranscripts. ut  &   I,DouglasPalaschak,declarethefollowingunderpenaltyofperjury:IamanEngineeringGraduate L oftheUniversityofIllinois,Urbana,whereIwasanhonorsstudent.Imarchedin TheMarching_Illini_,the "r worldsundisputedPremiereMarchingBand.IbeganmycareerasaRegisteredProfessionalEngineer H  havingconsultedfortheU.S.Navy,Mobil,andExxon.Ihavetestifiedasanexpertwitnessinthecatastrophic n   failureofoilproductionmachinery.      Ihavebeenalicensedlawyerfornearlyaquartercentury.Ipublishnearly1200legalarticlesonthe   internet.Myareasofexpertiseare:  0    Licenses,Rights,andPrivileges,andtheiruseasInstrumentsofOppression, V    CriminalDefense, ,|    InternetdrivenImprovementsintheEfficiencyofLitigation, R    EmpowermentofProSeLitigants, x    Bankruptcy.    MymostrecentbookisonthesubjectofPretrialCriminalLitigationof_Malum_Ԁ_Prohibitum_ԀCrimes.  Itisavailablebymailorderviatheinternet. :   RecentlyChristopherChristenseninquiredregardingthiscase. `    IaskedChristopherforthetranscriptsofthepreviouscourtsessions. 6"   IwasinIllinoisinJulytoharvestwheatandpicksweetcornatthefamilyfarmandsellitintown. \$ However,itwouldbefinanciallyprohibitivetoappearinpersontoday.AtthispointIhavenotseenanypolice & report,ticket,orotherdiscoveryinthiscase.InordertoweighthemeritsofthecaseIneedtoreadthese ( basicsfirst. *   Iamoptimisticthatthiscasecanbeefficientlyresolvedtothepleasureofallparties. D,   Christopherhasworkedallhisadultlife.Heisaseriousyoungmanandaproductivememberof j. society.WeneedmorepeoplelikeChristopher.Hehasbeenadriverfor11yearsandhasnevercrashed. @ 0 Heisagooddriver.Hisworkrequiresthathedrive. f!2   ItisregrettablethatChristopherspreviouslawyerwasunwillingtodevotesufficienttimeandeffort "4 onthiscase.However,theconstitutionforbidsustopunishChristopherforthis.Christopherisentitledto #6 effectiveassistanceofcounselmorethanthebareminimumenunciatedbythecourtin _Strickland_. Onthe $( 8 internetIpublishamorerealisticuptodatestandardforeffectiveassistanceat %N!: Ѐ4 O  5  Shttp://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/5635.html6O  7 Ԁ.#S˶# $'t"<   Thelegalsubjectoflicensesisonewheredynamictensionisatplay.Ouroppressivebureaucracies J(#> havebystealthyencroachmenttakenawayourmostbasicrightsandsoldthembacktouseaslicensesand p)$@ permits.Thoseagenciesandbureausdisparagethetruthandattempttomakeisseemasthoughallrights *%B arethepropertyofthestatetobedoledoutatthewhimofthestate.Drivinglicensesandbarlicensesare + 'D r     twoexamples.Irecommendthefollowingarticletoexplaintheconfusioninthelanguageoflicensesand  rights: _%    _PublicLicensesandPrivateRights (1953)Excerptsfrom33OregonLawReview1(Barnett,1953) & publishedat:4 pO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8k.com/5943.html6<OP   7R~Ԁ L   Iaskthiscourtsindulgenceregardingourattempttoobtainthepolicereportsandotherdiscovery "r inthiscasesothatChristophercanenjoyhisrighttofullyadvisedcounselandeffectiveassistance. H    IhavebeenpaidnothinginthiscaseandIhavenotagreedtohandlethiscaseuntilIcanfullyinquire n   astothefactsandhistoryofthiscase.    Signedbyspecificpermission.____________________DouglasPalaschak.Thursday,August24,2006   AX ) xdEcxA  0  @%   XaX Appendix1:DetailedBriefregardingtheDoctrineentitled VoidforVagueness #XXa#  վԈ V  @G G XaX VoidforVagueness.FourteenthAmendmentAnnotations #XXa#Ԉ ,|  @ Thisarticleisat47 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vagueness.html6rO  7Ԁ R  Firstannotation: x   Connallyvs.GeneralConstructionCo. (1926)  Ѐ4O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague26.html6O  7TԀ269U.S.385  ` Thequestionwhethergivenlegislativeenactmentshavebeenthuswantingincertaintyhas : frequentlybeenbeforethiscourt.Insomeofthecasesthestatutesinvolvedwereupheld;in `  others,declaredinvalid.Theprecisepointofdifferentiationinsomeinstancesisnoteasyof 6" statement;butitwillbeenoughforpresentpurposestosaygenerallythatthedecisionsof \$ thecourt,upholdingstatutesassufficientlycertain,restedupontheconclusionthatthey & employedwordsorphraseshavingatechnicalorotherspecialmeaning,wellenoughknown ( toenablethosewithintheirreachtocorrectlyapplythemSupremeCourtin1926in *  ConnallyvGen.Construction.  D, `   Thatthetermsofapenalstatutecreatinganewoffensemustbesufficientlyexplicittoinformthose j. whoaresubjecttoitwhatconductontheirpartwillrenderthemliabletoitspenaltiesisawell-recognized @ 0 requirement,consonantalikewithordinarynotionsoffairplayandthesettledrulesoflaw;andastatutewhich f!2 eitherforbidsorrequiresthedoingofanactintermssovaguethatmenofcommonintelligencemust "4 necessarilyguessatitsmeaninganddifferastoitsapplicationviolatesthefirstessentialof %    dueprocess of #6 law. $( 8 %   F  InternationalHarvesterCo.v.Kentucky ,234U.S.216,221,34S.Ct.853; %    Collinsv.Kentucky ,234U.S. %N!: 634,638,34S.Ct.924[269U.S.385,393]4efrO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague14.html6O tth  7ef7Ԁ... $'t"< ` Thedividinglinebetweenwhatislawfulandunlawfulcannotbelefttoconjecture.Thecitizen J(#> cannotbeheldtoanswerchargesbaseduponpenalstatuteswhosemandatesareso p)$@ uncertainthattheywillreasonablyadmitofdifferentconstructions.Acriminalstatutecannot *%B restuponanuncertainfoundation.Thecrime,andtheelementsconstitutingit,mustbeso + 'D clearlyexpressedthattheordinarypersoncanintelligentlychoose,inadvance,whatcourse  itislawfulforhimtopursue.Penalstatutesprohibitingthedoingofcertainthings,and & providingapunishmentfortheirviolation,shouldnotadmitofsuchadoublemeaningthatthe L _citizenmayactupontheoneconceptionofitsrequirementsandthecourtsuponanother.' "r `  %    Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates (1892) H  Ѐ4 O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/vague92.html6 O]   7MԀ#W#Ԁ143U.S.457;12S.Ct.511: n   ` Ҁ"Alllawsshouldreceiveasensibleconstruction.Generaltermsshouldbesolimitedintheir    applicationasnottoleadtoinjustice,oppression,oranabsurdconsequence.Itwillalways   bepresumedthatthelegislatureintendedexceptionstoitslanguagewhichwouldavoid  0  resultsofthischaracter.Thereasonofthelawinsuchcasesshouldprevailoveritsletter." V   Rector,Etc.,OfHolyTrinityChurchv.UnitedStates 143U.S.457;12S.Ct.511(1892) ,|  ` U %    Wintersv.PeopleofStateofNewYork (1948)333U.S.507;68S.Ct.665: R  ` Ҁ"Menofcommonintelligencecannotberequiredtoguessatthemeaningofpenal x  enactment."Indeterminingwhetherpenalstatuteisinvalidforuncertainty,courtsmustdo  theirbesttodeterminewhethervaguenessisofsuchacharacterthatmenofcommon  intelligencemustguessatitsmeaning."Whereastatuteissovagueastomakecriminalan : innocentact,aconvictionunderitcannotbesustained." Wintersv.PeopleofStateof `  NewYork ,333U.S.507;68S.Ct.665(1948) 6" ` 7 %    Giacciov.StateofPennsylvania (1966)382U.S.399;86S.Ct.518: \$ Ҁ"Lawfailstomeetrequirementsof  dueprocessclauseifitissovagueandstandardlessthatitleaves & publicuncertainastoconductitprohibitsorleavesjudgesandjurorsfreetodecide,withoutany ( legallyfixedstandards,whatisprohibitedandwhatisnotineachparticularcase." Giacciov.State * ofPennsylvania ,382U.S.399;86S.Ct.518(1966) D, < %    Gouldv.Gould ,245US.,151(1917): j. ` "Intheinterpretationofstatuteslevyingtaxes,itisTHEESTABLISHEDRULENOTTO @ 0 EXTENDtheirprovisions,byimplication,BEYONDTHECLEARIMPORTOFTHE f!2 LANGUAGEUSED,ORTOENLARGEtheiroperationsSOASTOEMBRACEMATTERS "4 NOTSPECIFICALLYPOINTEDOUT" #6 `  %    Benzigerv.U.S. ,192U.S.38(1904): $( 8 Ҁ"Thisprovisionofthestatuteshouldbeliberallyconstruedinfavoroftheimporter,andiftherewere %N!: anyfairdoubtastothetrueconstructionoftheprovisioninquestion,thecourtsshouldresolvethe $'t"< doubtinhisfavor. %    AmericanNet&TwineCo.v.Worthington ,141U.S.468,35L.ed.821,12Sup. J(#> Ct.Rep.55;%    Ԁ UnitedStatesv.Wigglesworth ,2Story,369,Fed.Cas.No.16,690;%    Ԁ Ricev.United p)$@ States ,4C.C.A.104,10U.S.App.670,53Fed.910." *%B _ %    U.S.v.DeCadena ,105F.Supp.202,204(1952): + 'D Ҁ"Theessentialpurposeofthe"voidforvaguenessdoctrine"withrespecttointerpretationofacriminal  statute,istowarnindividualsofthecriminalconsequencesoftheirconduct....Criminalstatuteswhich & failtogiveduenoticethatanacthasbeenmadecriminalbeforeitisdoneareunconstitutional L deprivationsofdueprocessoflaw." "r  Hassettv.Welch (1938)303US303,pp.314-315,82LEd858: H  ` Ҁ"....ifdoubtexistsastotheconstructionofataxingstatute,thedoubtshouldberesolved n   infavorofthetaxpayer..."    `  %    Sewellv.Georgia ,435U.S.982(1978):   ҀAswesaidin Graynedv.CityofRockford (1972)408U.S.104,108(1972):"Itisabasicprinciple  0  of due  Ԁprocess thatanenactment[435U.S.982,986]isvoidforvaguenessifitsprohibitionsare V  notclearlydefined.Vaguelawsoffendseveralimportantvalues.First,becauseweassumethatman ,|  isfreetosteerbetweenlawfulandunlawfulconduct,weinsistthatlawsgivethepersonofordinary R  intelligenceareasonableopportunitytoknowwhatisprohibited,sothathemayactaccordingly. x  Vaguelawsmaytraptheinnocentbynotprovidingfairwarning.Second,ifarbitraryanddiscriminatory  enforcementistobeprevented,lawsmustprovideexplicitstandardsforthosewhoapplythem.A  vaguelawimpermissiblydelegatesbasicpolicymatterstopolicemen,judges,andjuriesforresolution : onanadhocandsubjectivebasis,withtheattendantdangersofarbitraryanddiscriminatory `  application."Seealso Papachristou%    Ԁv.CityofJacksonville ,405U.S.156(1972); %    ԀClinev.Frink 6" DairyCo., 274U.S.445,47S.Ct.681(1927); Connallyv.GeneralConstruction%    ԀCo. ,269U.S.385 \$ (1926). &  %    ԀKarlanv.CityofCincinatti ,416U.S.924(1974): ( ` Ҁ"Thesecasesallinvolveconvictionsunderordinancesandstatuteswhichpunishthemere * utteranceofwordsvariouslydescribedas'abusive,''vulgar,''insulting,''profane,''indecent,' D, 'boisterous,'andthelike.Theprovisionsarechallengedasbeingunconstitutionallyvague j. andoverbroad.The'voidforvagueness'doctrineis,ofcourse,a  dueprocess concept @ 0 implementingprinciplesoffairwarningandnon-discriminatoryenforcement.Vaguelawsmay f!2 trapthosewhodesiretobelaw-abidingbynotprovidingfairnoticeofwhatisprohibited. "4  Papachristouv.CityofJacksonville ,405U.S.156,162(1972); %    UnitedStatesv.Harriss , #6 347U.S.612,617(1954).Theyalsoprovideopportunityforarbitraryanddiscriminatory $( 8 enforcementsincethose[416U.S.924,925]whoapplythelawshavenoclearandexplicit %N!: standardstoguidethem. %    Coatesv.Cincinnati ,402U.S.611,614(1971); %    Shuttlesworth $'t"< v.Birmingham ,382U.S.87,90-91,15L.Ed.2d176(1965) J(#> 4` O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.8m.com/5089.html6Otec  7tabԀ(IncludesphotographofReverendFred p)$@ Shuttlesworth).Further,whenavaguestatute"abut[s]uponsensitiveareasofFirst *%B Amendmentfreedoms,'it'operatestoinhibittheexerciseof[those]freedoms.'Uncertain + 'D meaningsinevitablyleadcitizensto'steerfarwideroftheunlawfulzone...thanifthe  boundariesoftheforbiddenareaswereclearlymarked." Graynedv.CityofRockford , & 408U.S.104,109(1972),quoting%    Baggettv.Bullitt ,377U.S.360,372[1964loyaltyoath L case],and %    Speiserv.Randall ,357U.S.513,526(1958)." "r ` C%    Ԁ"Overbreadth,ontheotherhand,'offendstheconstitutionalprinciplethat'agovernmentalpurpose H  tocontrolorpreventactivitiesconstitutionallysubjecttostateregulationmaynotbeachievedby n   meanswhichsweepunnecessarilybroadlyandtherebyinvadetheareaofprotectedfreedoms."     Zwicklerv.Koota ,389U.S.241,250(1967),quoting %   } %    NAACPv.Alabama ,377U.S.288,307   (1964).  0   ` Avaguestatutemaybeoverbroadifitsuncertainboundariesleaveopenthepossibilityof V  punishmentforprotectedconductandthusleadcitizenstoavoidsuchprotectedactivityinorderto ,|  steerclearoftheuncertainproscriptions. Graynedv.CityofRockford supra,408U.S.at109;%     R   Dombrowskiv.Pfister ,380U.S.479,486(1965).Astatuteisalsooverbroad,however,if,even x  thoughitisclearandprecise,itprohibitsconstitutionallyprotectedconduct. %    Apthekerv.Secretary  ofState ,378U.S.500,508-509(1964);%    Ԁ Sheltonv.Tucker ,364U.S.479,488(1960)."  h %    CityofMesquitev.Alladin'sCastle,Inc. ,455U.S.283(1982): : Ҁ" Graynedv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.104,108(emphasis[455U.S.283,290]added)*fn12... `  [Footnote12]TheCourtofAppealssummarizedtherelevantauthoritiesasfollows:"Alawisvoid 6" forvaguenessifpersons`ofcommonintelligencemustnecessarilyguessatitsmeaninganddiffer \$ astoitsapplication....' Smithv.Goguen ,415U.S.566,572n.8,quotingConnallyv.General & ConstructionCo.,269U.S.385,391.SeegenerallyNote, %    TheVoid-for-VaguenessDoctrineinthe ( SupremeCourt ,109U.Pa.L.Rev.67(1960).Theoffenseto %    due process liesinboththenature * andconsequencesofvagueness.First,vaguelawsdonotgiveindividualsfairnoticeoftheconduct D, proscribed. Papachristouv.CityofJacksonville ,405U.S.156,162.Accord Graynedv.Cityof j. Rockford ,408U.S.104,108&n.3.Second,vaguelawsdonotlimittheexerciseofdiscretionbylaw @ 0 enforcementofficials;thustheyengenderthepossibilityofarbitraryanddiscriminatoryenforcement. f!2  %   P Graynedv.CityofRockford ,408U.S.at108-09&n.4 "4 4N O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/grayned.html69OM   7 V{Ԁ; %   T Papachristouv.CityofJacksonville (1971) #6 4R O  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/papachri.html6yO  7Ԁ,405U.S.at168-70.Third,vaguelawsdefeatthe $( 8 intrinsicpromiseof,andfrustratetheessenceof,aconstitutionalregime.Weremain`agovernment %N!: oflaws,andnotofmen,' %   x Marburyv.Madison (1803) $'t"< Ѐ4cMO  5  http://www.lawyerdude.netfirms.com/marbury.html6Olel  7siԀ5U.S.(1Cranch.)137,163,onlysolongasour J(#> lawsremainclear."%    630F.2d,at1037." p)$@ @"%    XaX ProofofService #XXa1#  $Ԉ *%B   TodayIservedthismotionupontheprosecutorinthiscasebypersonallydeliveringacopytohis + 'D receptionistinhisofficeinthiscourtbuilding.  Signed_________________ChristopherChristensen.Thursday,August24,2006. x