Exhibit 22: April 23, 2002. Page 8 of 9 pages. Order of 23 April, 2002, in the Chicago case regarding my invention.

Probative value: 1. It proves that I am not Broglen Hotel which in turn infers that I have never litigated regarding my patent which in turn precludes the application of the theory of res judicata to the instant case.

2. It proves that the rights were assigned back to Kelly before the putative settlement of the Los Angeles case which in turn negates the validity of any putative settlement in the Los Angeles case.

3. It demonstrates that Ryobi has and will likely continue to utilize specious arguments - such as the argument that they do no infringe on my patent even though they built their “Laser Trac” from my drawings on file at the patent department (as demonstrated in Exhibit 1 1.pdf ) - not to mention that they paid $1 million for what was purported to be my patent ( as explained in Exhibit 8 8.html (the 3% letter) and in Exhibit 9 9.html , page 3 9-3.jpg : 3% of $1 million = $30,000) - which they would not have done if they truly believed that they would not otherwise be infringing.

Page 1 is at the following link: 22-1.jpg

Page 2 is 22-2.jpg

22-8.jpg is the last page of the ruling/ order.

22-9.jpg is a court form pertaining to the order.